ArticleNature human behaviour2019
Multimodal imaging of brain connectivity reveals predictors of individual decision strategy in statistical learning.
Article in Nature human behaviour, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611788 (Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Structure Learning Training and Cognitive Flexibility
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Visual Statistical Learning Alters Low-Dimensional Cortical Architecture.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Incidental learning of predictive temporal context within cortical representations of visual shape.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- Neural Signatures of Predictive Strategies Track Individuals Along the Autism-Schizophrenia Continuum.Schizophrenia bulletin · 2023Article
- Article
- Confidence of probabilistic predictions modulates the cortical response to pain.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Flexible structure learning under uncertainty.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Intrinsic brain activity patterns across large-scale networks predict reciprocity propensity.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Linking Individual Differences in Personalized Functional Network Topography to Psychopathology in Youth.Biological psychiatry · 2022Article
- Computational and neural mechanisms of statistical pain learning.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Assessing the Core Variables of Business Managers' Intuitive Decision Ability: A Review and Analysis.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A New Remote Guided Method for Supervised Web-Based Cognitive Testing to Ensure High-Quality Data: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Successful human behaviour depends on the brain's ability to extract meaningful structure from information streams and make predictions about future events. Individuals can differ markedly in the decision strategies they use to learn the environment's statistics, yet we have little idea why. Here, we investigate whether the brain networks involved in learning temporal sequences without explicit reward differ depending on the decision strategy that individuals adopt. We demonstrate that individuals alter their decision strategy in response to changes in temporal statistics and engage dissociable circuits: extracting the exact sequence statistics relates to plasticity in motor corticostriatal circuits, while selecting the most probable outcomes relates to plasticity in visual, motivational and executive corticostriatal circuits. Combining graph metrics of functional and structural connectivity, we provide evidence that learning-dependent changes in these circuits predict individual decision strategy. Our findings propose brain plasticity mechanisms that mediate individual ability for interpreting the structure of variable environments.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.