ArticleSmart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2018
Early Hospital Mortality Prediction using Vital Signals.
Article in Smart health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Few-Shot Learning-Based Framework for Predicting Likelihood of In-patient's Mortality.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2025Article
- Toward Standardized Performance Metrics in the Cardiovascular ICU: A Systematic Review of Quality Indicators.Cureus · 2025Review
- Assessment of inflammatory markers, disease severity and comorbidities in very elderly patients with acute respiratory diseases.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2025Article
- Reliable generation of privacy-preserving synthetic electronic health record time series via diffusion models.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2024Article
- Identification of Time-Series Pattern Marker in Its Application to Mortality Analysis of Pneumonia Patients in Intensive Care Unit.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- Early prediction of in-hospital mortality utilizing multivariate predictive modelling of electronic medical records and socio-determinants of health of the first day of hospitalization.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2023Article
- EHR-Safe: generating high-fidelity and privacy-preserving synthetic electronic health records.NPJ digital medicine · 2023Article
- Strategies of Predictive Schemes and Clinical Diagnosis for Prognosis Using MIMIC-III: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Applying an Improved Stacking Ensemble Model to Predict the Mortality of ICU Patients with Heart Failure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Benchmarking emergency department prediction models with machine learning and public electronic health records.Scientific data · 2022Article
- Outcome Prediction in Critically-Ill Patients with Venous Thromboembolism and/or Cancer Using Machine Learning Algorithms: External Validation and Comparison with Scoring Systems.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Learning to predict in-hospital mortality risk in the intensive care unit with attention-based temporal convolution network.BMC anesthesiology · 2022Article
- Unstructured clinical notes within the 24 hours since admission predict short, mid & long-term mortality in adult ICU patients.PloS one · 2022Article
- Exploring the feasibility of vital signs-based mortality risk prediction in a care facility setting.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early hospital mortality prediction is critical as intensivists strive to make efficient medical decisions about the severely ill patients staying in intensive care units (ICUs). As a result, various methods have been developed to address this problem based on clinical records. However, some of the laboratory test results are time-consuming and need to be processed. In this paper, we propose a novel method to predict mortality using features extracted from the heart signals of patients within the first hour of ICU admission. In order to predict the risk, quantitative features have been computed based on the heart rate signals of ICU patients suffering cardiovascular diseases. Each signal is described in terms of 12 statistical and signal-based features. The extracted features are fed into eight classifiers: decision tree, linear discriminant, logistic regression, support vector machine (SVM), random forest, boosted trees, Gaussian SVM, and K-nearest neighborhood (K-NN). To derive insight into the performance of the proposed method, several experiments have been conducted using the well-known clinical dataset named Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III). The experimental results demonstrate the capability of the proposed method in terms of precision, recall, F1-score, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The decision tree classifier satisfies both accuracy and interpretability better than the other classifiers, producing an F1-score and AUC equal to 0.91 and 0.93, respectively. It indicates that heart rate signals can be used for predicting mortality in patients in the care units especially coronary care units (CCUs), achieving a comparable performance with existing predictions that rely on high dimensional features from clinical records which need to be processed and may contain missing information.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.