ReviewFrontiers in medicine2019
Big Health Data and Cardiovascular Diseases: A Challenge for Research, an Opportunity for Clinical Care.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Precision cardiovascular medicine with big data and AI.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Review
- Revolutionizing Utility of Big Data Analytics in Personalized Cardiovascular Healthcare.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Big data for neuroscience in the context of predictive, preventive, and personalized medicine.The EPMA journal · 2025Review
- Review
- Evaluating the diagnostic and triage performance of digital and online symptom checkers for the presentation of myocardial infarction; A retrospective cross-sectional study.PLOS digital health · 2024Article
- Performance Drift in Machine Learning Models for Cardiac Surgery Risk Prediction: Retrospective Analysis.JMIRx med · 2024Article
- Cardiovascular Mortality in Takotsubo Syndrome: A Mystery Awaiting Solving.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Topological Data Analysis in Cardiovascular Signals: An Overview.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Seasonal variations of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome and its markers using big-data of health check-ups.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2024Article
- Challenges and best practices for digital unstructured data enrichment in health research: A systematic narrative review.PLOS digital health · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Based Methods for Precision Cardiovascular Medicine.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Review
- Developing a minimum data set for cardiovascular Computerized Physician Order Entry (CPOE) and mapping the data set to FHIR: A multi-method approach.Journal of medical systems · 2023Article
- Identification of a circulating microRNAs biomarker panel for non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease: case-control study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- A machine learning-based risk stratification tool for in-hospital mortality of intensive care unit patients with heart failure.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Article
- Big Data in Cardiology: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Apolipoprotein B and Cardiovascular Disease: Biomarker and Potential Therapeutic Target.Metabolites · 2021Review
- Social Determinants of Health and Cardiovascular Disease: Current State and Future Directions Towards Healthcare Equity.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2021Review
- High performance implementation of the hierarchical likelihood for generalized linear mixed models: an application to estimate the potassium reference range in massive electronic health records datasets.BMC medical research methodology · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Yoga Lifestyle on Lipid Metabolism in a Vulnerable Population-A Community Based Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.Medicines (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) accounts for the majority of death and hospitalization, health care expenditures and loss of productivity in developed country. CVD research, thus, plays a key role for improving patients' outcomes as well as for the sustainability of health systems. The increasing costs and complexity of modern medicine along with the fragmentation in healthcare organizations interfere with improving quality care and represent a missed opportunity for research. The advancement in diagnosis, therapy and prognostic evaluation of patients with CVD, indeed, is frustrated by limited data access to selected small patient populations, not standardized nor computable definition of disease and lack of approved relevant patient-centered outcomes. These critical issues results in a deep mismatch between randomized controlled trials and real-world setting, heterogeneity in treatment response and wide inter-individual variation in prognosis. Big data approach combines millions of people's electronic health records (EHR) from different resources and provides a new methodology expanding data collection in three direction: high volume, wide variety and extreme acquisition speed. Large population studies based on EHR holds much promise due to low costs, diminished study participant burden, and reduced selection bias, thus offering an alternative to traditional ascertainment through biomedical screening and tracing processes. By merging and harmonizing large data sets, the researchers aspire to build algorithms that allow targeted and personalized CVD treatments. In current paper, we provide a critical review of big health data for cardiovascular research, focusing on the opportunities of this largely free data analytics and the challenges in its realization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.