ArticleWorld journal of plastic surgery2019
The Healing Effect of
Article in World journal of plastic surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifunctional 3D-Printed Alginate Emulgel Patches Incorporating Plant Extracts for Potential Burn Wound Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The healing effect of nano emulsified Plantago major L extract on oral wounds in a wistar rat model.BMC complementary medicine and therapies · 2024Article
- Evidence for Natural Products as Alternative Wound-Healing Therapies.Biomolecules · 2023Review
- Therapeutic Efficacy of Great Plantain (International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
- Historical ethnobotanical review of medicinal plants used to treat children diseases in Romania (1860s-1970s).Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrevious studies indicated that both
methodsIn an experiential study, 36 male Sprague-Dawley rats (200±20 g) were randomly assigned into three groups (n=12): The control group which received no treatment, gel base treated group, and the 5%
resultsPA treated group showed faster wound closure rate in comparison with control and gel-base groups (
conclusionWe showed that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.