Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873293›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2019

Anterior chamber paracentesis during intravitreal injections in observational trials: effectiveness and safety and effects.

Sandeep Saxena, Timothy Y Lai, Hideki Koizumi, Michel E Farah, Daniela Ferrara, David Pelayes, Tomohito Sato, Carsten H Meyer, Timothy Murray, International Pharmacokinetic Collaboration

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Intravitreal plungerless injector device (IPLID) for anterior chamber paracentesis: a novel approach to aqueous humor sampling.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sandeep Saxena1Department of Ophthalmology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.
Timothy Y LaiHong Kong Eye Hospital, Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Hideki Koizumi3Department of Ophthalmology, University of the Ryukyus, Okinawa, Japan.
Michel E Farah4Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Ferrara5Department of Ophthalmology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts USA.
David Pelayes6Department of Ophthalmology, Buenos Aires University and Maimonides University, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Tomohito Sato7Department of Ophthalmology, National Defense Medical College, Tokorozawa, Japan.
Carsten H MeyerDepartment of Ophthalmology, Smartlook, Aarau, Switzerland.
Timothy Murray9Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami, Miami, FL USA.
International Pharmacokinetic Collaboration

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A paracentesis prior to an intravitreal injection is a very safe procedure and can prevent IOP-spikes after injections. As these spikes pose the risk of inducing glaucomatous changes particularly in patients with frequent injections and/or with a risk profile, a regular paracentesis prior to an injection may be considered and discussed with the patient.

Identifiers

PMID30873293
PMCPMC6402161

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.