Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873122›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2019

Regulation of Polycomb Repression by

Amélie Decourcelle, Dominique Leprince, Vanessa Dehennaut

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Epigenetic Regulation in Drosophila Tumor Models.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Dissecting OGT's TPR domain to identify determinants of cellular function.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Brain on food: The neuroepigenetics of nutrition.Neurochemistry international · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Cancers · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amélie DecourcelleUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR8161, M3T: Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapies, Lille, France.
Dominique LeprinceUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR8161, M3T: Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapies, Lille, France.
Vanessa DehennautUniversité de Lille, CNRS, Institut Pasteur de Lille, UMR8161, M3T: Mechanisms of Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapies, Lille, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Lille · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic modifications are major actors of early embryogenesis and carcinogenesis and are sensitive to nutritional environment. In recent years, the nutritional sensor

Indexed as

cancerdrosophila developmentepigeneticO-GlcNAcylationPolycomb

Identifiers

PMID30873122
PMCPMC6400832
OpenAlexW2916556304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.