Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30873062›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2019

Studying the Real-Time Interpretation of Novel Noun and Verb Meanings in Young Children.

Alex de Carvalho, Mireille Babineau, John C Trueswell, Sandra R Waxman, Anne Christophe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Alex de CarvalhoLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, DEC-ENS/EHESS/CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL University, Paris, France.
Mireille BabineauLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, DEC-ENS/EHESS/CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL University, Paris, France.
John C TrueswellDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Sandra R WaxmanDepartment of Psychology, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, United States.
Anne ChristopheLaboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, DEC-ENS/EHESS/CNRS, Ecole Normale Supérieure - PSL University, Paris, France.

Funding

THE DEVELOPMENT OF ON - LINE SENTENCE PROCESSING IN CHILDRENR01HD037507 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI GLEITMAN, LILA R, TRUESWELL, JOHN C · 1999 to 2017
$4.6M
Linking language and cognition in infancy: Entry points and developmental changeR01HD083310 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY · PI WAXMAN, SANDRA R · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037507NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD083310
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Decades of research show that children rely on the linguistic context in which novel words occur to infer their meanings. However, because learning in these studies was assessed after children had heard numerous occurrences of a novel word in informative linguistic contexts, it is impossible to determine how much exposure would be needed for a child to learn from such information. This study investigated the speed with which French 20-month-olds and 3-to-4-year-olds exploit function words to determine the syntactic category of novel words and therefore infer their meanings. In a real-time preferential looking task, participants saw two videos side-by-side on a TV-screen: one showing a person performing a novel action, and the other a person passively holding a novel object. At the same time, participants heard only three occurrences of a novel word preceded either by a determiner (e.g., "Regarde! Une dase! - "Look! A dase!") or a pronoun (e.g., "Regarde! Elle dase!" - "Look! She's dasing!"). 3-to-4-year-olds exploited function words to categorize novel words and infer their meanings: they looked more to the novel action in the verb condition, while participants in the noun condition looked more to the novel object. 20-month-olds, however, did not show this difference. We discuss possible reasons for why 20-month-olds may have found it difficult to infer novel word meanings in our task. Given that 20-month-olds can use function words to learn word meanings in experiments providing many repetitions, we suspect that more repetitions might be needed to observe positive effects of learning in this age range in our task. Our study establishes nevertheless that before age 4, young children become able to exploit function words to infer the meanings of unknown words as soon as they occur. This ability to interpret speech in real-time and build interpretations about novel word meanings might be extremely useful for young children to map words to their possible referents and to boost their acquisition of word meanings.

Indexed as

eye movementslanguage acquisitionlanguage processingnoun learningsyntactic bootstrappingverb learning

Identifiers

PMID30873062
PMCPMC6401638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.