Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872999›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2019

Does

Laura R Cortes, Carla D Cisternas, Nancy G Forger

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
13.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Do Sex and Gender Have Separate Identities?Archives of sexual behavior · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Designing and Teaching Courses on Sex, Gender, and the Brain: Two Implementations in the Undergraduate Classroom.Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Sex and gender in neurodevelopmental conditions.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Teaching About Sex and Gender in Neuroscience: More Than Meets the "XY".Journal of undergraduate neuroscience education : JUNE : a publication of FUN, Faculty for Undergraduate Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. The Person's Care Requires a Sex and Gender Approach.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Epigenetic Mediation ofBrain sciences · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Sexes on the brain: Sex as multiple biological variables in the neuronal control of feeding.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura R CortesNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Carla D CisternasNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Nancy G ForgerNeuroscience Institute, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Georgia State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The words "sex" and "gender" are often used interchangeably in common usage. In fact, the Merriam-Webster dictionary offers "sex" as the definition of gender. The authors of this review are neuroscientists, and the words "sex" and "gender" mean very different things to us: sex is based on biological factors such as sex chromosomes and gonads, whereas gender has a social component and involves differential expectations or treatment by conspecifics, based on an individual's perceived sex. While we are accustomed to thinking about "sex" and differences between males and females in epigenetic marks in the brain, we are much less used to thinking about the biological implications of gender. Nonetheless, careful consideration of the field of epigenetics leads us to conclude that gender must also leave an epigenetic imprint on the brain. Indeed, it would be strange if this were not the case, because all environmental influences of any import can epigenetically change the brain. In the following pages, we explain why there is now sufficient evidence to suggest that an epigenetic imprint for gender is a logical conclusion. We define our terms for sex, gender, and epigenetics, and describe research demonstrating sex differences in epigenetic mechanisms in the brain which, to date, is mainly based on work in non-human animals. We then give several examples of how gender, rather than sex, may cause the brain epigenome to differ in males and females, and finally consider the myriad of ways that sex and gender interact to shape gene expression in the brain.

Indexed as

alcoholcosmeticsepigeneticsgendersexstress

Identifiers

PMID30872999
PMCPMC6400866
OpenAlexW2917073988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.