Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872875›Full record

ArticleBiogeochemistry2019

Spatial variability of organic matter properties determines methane fluxes in a tropical forested peatland.

N T Girkin, C H Vane, H V Cooper, V Moss-Hayes, J Craigon, B L Turner, N Ostle, S Sjögersten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biogeochemistry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Spatial and temporal variability of soil NGlobal change biology · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

N T Girkin1School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7562-5775
C H VaneBritish Geological Survey, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, Keyworth, NG12 5GG UK.
H V Cooper1School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
V Moss-HayesBritish Geological Survey, Centre for Environmental Geochemistry, Keyworth, NG12 5GG UK.
J Craigon1School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.
B L Turner3Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado, 0843-03092 Balboa, Ancon Republic of Panama.
N Ostle4Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ UK.
S Sjögersten1School of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tropical peatland ecosystems are a significant component of the global carbon cycle and feature a range of distinct vegetation types, but the extent of links between contrasting plant species, peat biogeochemistry and greenhouse gas fluxes remains unclear. Here we assessed how vegetation affects small scale variation of tropical peatland carbon dynamics by quantifying in situ greenhouse gas emissions over 1 month using the closed chamber technique, and peat organic matter properties using Rock-Eval 6 pyrolysis within the rooting zones of canopy palms and broadleaved evergreen trees. Mean methane fluxes ranged from 0.56 to 1.2 mg m

Indexed as

Carbon dioxideGeochemistryMethaneOrganic matterRock-Eval pyrolysisTropical peat

Identifiers

PMID30872875
PMCPMC6383829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.