Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872752›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Six novel immunoglobulin genes as biomarkers for better prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer by gene co-expression network analysis.

Huan-Ming Hsu, Chi-Ming Chu, Yu-Jia Chang, Jyh-Cherng Yu, Chien-Ting Chen, Chen-En Jian, Chia-Yi Lee, Yueh-Tao Chiang, Chi-Wen Chang, Yu-Tien Chang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Analysis of community connectivity in spatial transcriptomics data.Frontiers in applied mathematics and statistics · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Huan-Ming HsuGraduate of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chi-Ming ChuDivision of Biostatistics and Informatics, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-Jia ChangGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jyh-Cherng YuDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chien-Ting ChenDivision of Biostatistics and Informatics, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chen-En JianDivision of Biostatistics and Informatics, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Yi LeeDivision of Biostatistics and Informatics, Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yueh-Tao ChiangSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Chi-Wen ChangSchool of Nursing, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Yu-Tien ChangGraduate of Medical Sciences, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan. greengarden720925@gmail.com.
National Defense Medical Center · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWChang Gung University · TWFu Jen Catholic University · TWTaipei Medical University · TWTri-Service General Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene co-expression network analysis (GCNA) can detect alterations in regulatory activities in case/control comparisons. We propose a framework to detect novel genes and networks for predicting breast cancer recurrence. Thirty-four prognosis candidate genes were selected based on a literature review. Four Gene Expression Omnibus Series (GSE) microarray datasets (n = 920) were used to create gene co-expression networks based on these candidates. We applied the framework to four comparison groups according to node (+/-) and recurrence (+/-). We identified a sub-network containing two candidate genes (LST1 and IGHM) and six novel genes (IGHA1, IGHD, IGHG1, IGHG3, IGLC2, and IGLJ3) related to B cell-specific immunoglobulin. These novel genes were correlated with recurrence under the control of node status and were found to function as tumor suppressors; higher mRNA expression indicated a lower risk of recurrence (hazard ratio, HR = 0.87, p = 0.001). We created an immune index score by performing principle component analysis and divided the genes into low and high groups. This discrete index significantly predicted relapse-free survival (RFS) (high: HR = 0.77, p = 0.019; low: control). Public tool KM Plotter and TCGA-BRCA gene expression data were used to validate. We confirmed these genes are correlated with RFS and distal metastasis-free survival (DMFS) in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and general breast cancer.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGene Regulatory NetworksHumansImmunoglobulinsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisPrognosisSurvival AnalysisTriple Negative Breast NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorImmunoglobulins

Identifiers

PMID30872752
PMCPMC6418134
OpenAlexW2921521376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.