Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872700›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

'Genome skimming' with the MinION hand-held sequencer identifies CITES-listed shark species in India's exports market.

Shaili Johri, Jitesh Solanki, Vito Adrian Cantu, Sam R Fellows, Robert A Edwards, Isabel Moreno, Asit Vyas, Elizabeth A Dinsdale

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Real-time genomics for One Health.Molecular systems biology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vaccinomics to Design a Multi-Epitopes Vaccine forInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shaili JohriDepartment of Biology, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.
Jitesh SolankiCollege of Fisheries Science, Rajendra Bhuvan Road, Junagadh Agricultural University, Veraval, Gujarat, 362266, India.
Vito Adrian CantuComputational Sciences Research Center, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3168-5140
Sam R FellowsDepartment of Biology, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.
Robert A EdwardsComputational Sciences Research Center, 5500 Campanile Drive, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.
Isabel MorenoDepartment of Biology, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA.
Asit VyasCollege of Fisheries Science, Rajendra Bhuvan Road, Junagadh Agricultural University, Veraval, Gujarat, 362266, India.
Elizabeth A DinsdaleDepartment of Biology, 5500 Campanile Dr., San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, 92128, USA. edinsdale@mail.sdsu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chondrichthyes - sharks, rays, skates, and chimeras, are among the most threatened and data deficient vertebrate species. Global demand for shark and ray derived products, drives unregulated and exploitative fishing practices, which are in turn facilitated by the lack of ecological data required for effective conservation of these species. Here, we describe a Next Generation Sequencing method (using the MinION, a hand-held portable sequencing device from Oxford Nanopore Technologies), and analyses pipeline for molecular ecological studies in Chondrichthyes. Using this method, the complete mitochondrial genome and nuclear intergenic and protein-coding sequences were obtained by direct sequencing of genomic DNA obtained from shark fin tissue. Recovered loci include mitochondrial barcode sequences- Cytochrome oxidase I, NADH2, 16S rRNA and 12S rRNA- and nuclear genetic loci such as 5.8S rRNA, Internal Transcribed Spacer 2, and 28S rRNA regions, which are commonly used for taxonomic identification. Other loci recovered were the nuclear protein-coding genes for antithrombin or SerpinC, Immunoglobulin lambda light chain, Preprogehrelin, selenium binding protein 1(SBP1), Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) and Recombination-Activating Gene 1 (RAG1). The median coverage across all genetic loci was 20x and sequence accuracy was ≥99.8% compared to reference sequences. Analyses of the nuclear ITS2 region and the mitochondrial protein-encoding loci allowed accurate taxonomic identification of the shark specimen as Carcharhinus falciformis, a CITES Appendix II species. MinION sequencing provided 1,152,211 bp of new shark genome, increasing the number of sequenced shark genomes to five. Phylogenetic analyses using both mitochondrial and nuclear loci provided evidence that Prionace glauca is nested within Carcharhinus, suggesting the need for taxonomic reassignment of P. glauca. We increased genomic information about a shark species for ecological and population genetic studies, enabled accurate identification of the shark tissue for biodiversity indexing and resolved phylogenetic relationships among multiple taxa. The method was independent of amplification bias, and adaptable for field assessments of other Chondrichthyes and wildlife species in the future.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell NucleusDNAEndangered SpeciesFish ProteinsGenome, MitochondrialGenome SizeHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingIndiaMitochondriaPhylogenyRNA, RibosomalSequence Analysis, DNASharksDNAFish ProteinsRNA, Ribosomal

Identifiers

PMID30872700
PMCPMC6418218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.