Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872580›Full record

ArticleNature communications2019

A reference-grade wild soybean genome.

Min Xie, Claire Yik-Lok Chung, Man-Wah Li, Fuk-Ling Wong, Xin Wang, Ailin Liu, Zhili Wang, Alden King-Yung Leung, Tin-Hang Wong, Suk-Wah Tong and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 140 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
140citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

140 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

80 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Min Xie *Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Claire Yik-Lok Chung *Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9947-7591
Man-Wah Li *Centre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4859-5683
Fuk-Ling WongCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Xin WangCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5996-036X
Ailin LiuCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Zhili WangCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Alden King-Yung LeungCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Tin-Hang WongCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Suk-Wah TongCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Zhixia XiaoCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Kejing FanCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Ming-Sin NgCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Xinpeng QiCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Linfeng YangBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, Guangdong, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3986-5533
Tianquan DengBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, Guangdong, China.
Lijuan HeBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, Guangdong, China.
Lu ChenBGI Genomics, BGI-Shenzhen, Shenzhen, 518083, Guangdong, China.
Aisi FuWuhan Institute of Biotechnology, Wuhan, 430075, Hubei, China.
Qiong DingWuhan Institute of Biotechnology, Wuhan, 430075, Hubei, China.
Junxian HeCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
Gyuhwa ChungDepartment of Biotechnology, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, 550-749, Jeonnam, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8053-689X
Sachiko IsobeKazusa DNA Research Institute, Kazusa-Kamatari, Kisarazu, 292-0818, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9555-5054
Takanari TanabataKazusa DNA Research Institute, Kazusa-Kamatari, Kisarazu, 292-0818, Chiba, Japan.
Babu ValliyodanDivision of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9457-9508
Henry T NguyenDivision of Plant Sciences and National Center for Soybean Biotechnology, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-1800
Steven B CannonCorn Insects and Crop Genetics Research Unit, United States Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (USDA-ARS), Ames, Iowa, 50011-4014, USA.
Christine H FoyerFaculty of Biological Sciences, Centre for Plant Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, Yorkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5989-6989
Ting-Fung ChanCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. tf.chan@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0489-3884
Hon-Ming LamCentre for Soybean Research of the State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology and School of Life Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China. honming@cuhk.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6673-8740

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient crop improvement depends on the application of accurate genetic information contained in diverse germplasm resources. Here we report a reference-grade genome of wild soybean accession W05, with a final assembled genome size of 1013.2 Mb and a contig N50 of 3.3 Mb. The analytical power of the W05 genome is demonstrated by several examples. First, we identify an inversion at the locus determining seed coat color during domestication. Second, a translocation event between chromosomes 11 and 13 of some genotypes is shown to interfere with the assignment of QTLs. Third, we find a region containing copy number variations of the Kunitz trypsin inhibitor (KTI) genes. Such findings illustrate the power of this assembly in the analysis of large structural variations in soybean germplasm collections. The wild soybean genome assembly has wide applications in comparative genomic and evolutionary studies, as well as in crop breeding and improvement programs.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDNA Copy Number VariationsDomesticationGenome, PlantGenomicsGenotypeGlycine maxMolecular Sequence AnnotationPeptidesPlant BreedingPlant ProteinsQuantitative Trait LociTranslocation, GeneticKunitz-type protease inhibitor, plantPeptidesPlant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID30872580
PMCPMC6418295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.