SynthesisBMJ open2019
Outcome of surgical repair of adult digital nerve injury: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.
- Treatment options for digital nerve injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Pooled it
- Innervated Local Flap Reconstruction for Digital Soft Tissue Defects: A Systematic Review.ANZ journal of surgeryPooled it
- The NEON (Nerve rEpair Or Not) trial: a randomized controlled trial of microsurgical repair versus nerve alignment for digital nerve injury.The British journal of surgery · 2025Trial
- Observation of the therapeutic effect and analysis of risk factors in the acute repair of traumatic digital nerve injury.Chinese journal of traumatology = Zhonghua chuang shang za zhi · 2026Article
- Cast Or ePineural Suture for digital nerve injuries (COPS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.Trials · 2026Article
- Pain medication and nerve injuries in upper or lower limb-a Swedish national registry study.Pain reports · 2026Article
- A Novel Atraumatic Polymer-Assisted Peripheral Nerve Repair Device Compared With Microsurgical Neurorrhaphy.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Article
- Advances in sciatic nerve regeneration: A review of contemporary techniques.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
- Clinical evaluation of a novel disposable neurostimulator used to accelerate regeneration of injured peripheral nerves in the hand.Bioelectronic medicine · 2025Article
- Top 75 most-cited articles in hand microsurgery: A bibliometric and visualised analysis.Journal of hand and microsurgery · 2025Article
- Are Gabapentinoids Effective at Reducing Pain and Improving Sleep After Nerve Injury? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Minimally Invasive Suture Technique Pull-out to Repair the Acute Flexor Tendons in Zone II of the Hand.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2024Article
- Digital nerve injury: to repair or not?Irish journal of medical science · 2023Article
- Promotion effect of TGF-β-Zfp423-ApoD pathway on lip sensory recovery after nerve sacrifice caused by nerve collateral compensation.International journal of oral science · 2023Article
- Incidence, demographics and rehabilitation after digital nerve injury: A population-based study of 1004 adult patients in Sweden.PloS one · 2023Article
- Is microsurgical experience essential in Zone II flexor tendon injuries?Joint diseases and related surgery · 2023Article
- Electric shock sign after digital nerve injury; report of a case and review of literature.International journal of surgery case reports · 2022Article
- Cold sensitivity, functional disability and predicting factors after a repaired digital nerve injury.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Traumatized Hand - Update at the First Visit.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2021Article
- Injury-Induced HSP27 Expression in Peripheral Nervous Tissue Is Not Associated with Any Alteration in Axonal Outgrowth after Immediate or Delayed Nerve Repair.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesA systematic review to assess the evidence supporting surgical repair of digital nerve injury versus no repair in adults in terms of clinical outcomes.
designA Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant systematic review with methodology based on the Cochrane Handbook of Systematic Reviews of Interventions. DATA SOURCES: Databases included OvidMEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, clinicaltrials.gov and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, searched from inception until 10 November 2018. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Adult digital nerve injury in which either direct repair or no repair was undertaken and an outcome measure was recorded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Study data extracted included demographics, injury type and extent, timing, treatment details, outcome data and time points, adverse outcomes, hand therapy and return to work. The National Institute of Health quality assessment tool for case series was used to assess risk of bias.
resultsThirty studies were included. One compared surgical repair with non-repair. All studies were case series of between 15 and 110 nerve injuries, with heterogeneous patient, injury and treatment characteristics. Two studies detailed nerve repair without magnification. Static 2-point discrimination (s2PD) was the most commonly reported outcome measure. Return of protective sensation was achieved in most cases in the nerve repair and no nerve repair groups. Repair resulted in better s2PD than no repair, but <25% repaired nerves achieved normal levels. Adverse outcomes were similar between repair and no repair groups.
conclusionsOnly level IV evidence is available to support surgical repair of digital nerves in adults. Return of normal sensibility is uncommon and almost all unrepaired nerves regained protective sensation by 6 months and all patients declined further surgery. There was no difference in adverse outcomes. There is currently a lack of high-quality evidence to support surgical repair of digital nerve injuries in adults and further research is needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42017065092.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.