ArticleBMJ open2019
Lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy to reduce obstetric anal sphincter injury in vacuum-assisted delivery in nulliparous women: study protocol on a randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02643108 (Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lateral Episiotomy Versus no Episiotomy in Vacuum Assisted Delivery in Non-parous Women), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Lateral Episiotomy Versus no Episiotomy in Vacuum Assisted Delivery in Non-parous Women
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lateral episiotomy or no episiotomy in vacuum assisted delivery in nulliparous women (EVA): multicentre, open label, randomised controlled trial.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Trial
- Episiotomy in vacuum extraction, do we cut the levator ani muscle? A prospective cohort study.International urogynecology journal · 2022Trial
- Trial
- IUGA International Guidelines on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Episiotomy and Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury in the Setting of Instrumental Vaginal Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2026Article
- The association between episiotomy or OASIS at vacuum extraction in nulliparous women and subsequent prelabor cesarean delivery: A nationwide observational study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Observational
- Effect of Dry Heat Application on Perineal Pain and Episiotomy Wound Healing among Primipara Women.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2023Article
- Risk factors accounting for anal incontinence during the first year after vaginal delivery-A case control study in China.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Perineal stress as a predictor of performing episiotomy in primiparous women: a prospective observational study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2022Observational
- Anal incontinence after a prolonged second stage of labor in primiparous women.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- French guidelines for restrictive episiotomy during instrumental delivery were not followed by an increase in obstetric anal sphincter injury.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Which elements were significant in reducing obstetric anal sphincter injury? A prospective follow-up study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2021Article
- Pelvic floor dysfunction one year after first childbirth in relation to perineal tear severity.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- The perception and knowledge about episiotomy: A cross-sectional survey involving healthcare workers in a low- and middle-income country.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2021Article
- Does birthweight have a role in the effect of episiotomy on anal sphincter injury?Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2020Article
- Shifting Trends in Obstetrics: An 18-year Analysis of Low-risk Births at a German University Hospital.In vivo (Athens, Greece)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionObstetric anal sphincter injury (OASIS) occurs in 5%-7% of normal deliveries and increases with vacuum extraction (VE) to 12%-14% in nulliparous women in Sweden. Lateral/mediolateral episiotomy may reduce the prevalence of OASIS at VE in nulliparous women. The current use of episiotomy is restrictive. The protective effect and consequences are uncertain. This trial will investigate if lateral episiotomy can reduce the prevalence of OASIS and assess short-term and long-term effects. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial of lateral episiotomy versus no episiotomy in nulliparous women with a singleton, live fetus, after gestational week 34+0 with indication for VE. A lateral episiotomy of 4 cm is cut at crowning, 1-3 cm from the midline, at a 60° angle. The primary outcome is OASIS by clinical diagnosis analysed according to intention to treat. To demonstrate a 50% reduction in OASIS prevalence (from 12.4% to 6.2%), 710 women will be randomised at a 1:1 ratio. Secondary outcomes are pain, blood loss, other perineal injuries, perineal complications, Apgar score, cord pH and neonatal complications. Web-based questionnaires at baseline, 2 months, 1 and 5 years will be used to assess pain, incontinence, prolapse, sexual function, quality of life and childbirth experience. A subset of women will receive follow-up by pelvic floor sonography and pelvic examination. Mode of delivery and recurrence of OASIS/episiotomy in subsequent pregnancies will be assessed at 5 and 10 years using register data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial is open for enrolment. The trial has received ethical approval from the Regional Ethical Review Board of Stockholm and full funding from the Swedish Research Council. Women are interested in participation. The predominant restrictive view on episiotomy may limit recruitment. Results are of global interest and will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and at international congresses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02643108; Pre-results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.