ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2019
Reply to Laing et al.: Accurate prediction of circadian time across platforms.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identification of a Preliminary Plasma Metabolome-based Biomarker for Circadian Phase in Humans.Journal of biological rhythms · 2021Trial
- HairTime: A noninvasive assay for estimating circadian phase from a single hair sample.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Performance of Blood-Based Biomarkers for Human Circadian Pacemaker Phase: Training Sets Matter As Much As Feature-Selection Methods.Journal of biological rhythms · 2025Article
- Platform-independent estimation of human physiological time from single blood samples.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Machine learning estimation of human body time using metabolomic profiling.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Circadian Gene Expression Rhythms During Critical Illness.Critical care medicine · 2020Article
- Novel Approaches for Assessing Circadian Rhythmicity in Humans: A Review.Journal of biological rhythms · 2020Review
- Assessment of Circadian Rhythms.Neurologic clinics · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
- Comment on
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.