Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30872145›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2019

Combined Ultrasound and Cone Beam CT Improves Target Segmentation for Image Guided Radiation Therapy in Uterine Cervix Cancer.

Sarah A Mason, Ingrid M White, Tuathan O'Shea, Helen A McNair, Sophie Alexander, Eleftheria Kalaitzaki, Jeffrey C Bamber, Emma J Harris, Susan Lalondrelle

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Robotic CBCT meets robotic ultrasound.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah A MasonInstitute of Cancer Research, Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, United Kingdom.
Ingrid M WhiteRadiotherapy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Tuathan O'SheaRadiotherapy Physics Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Helen A McNairRadiotherapy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Sophie AlexanderRadiotherapy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Eleftheria KalaitzakiClinical Trials Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Jeffrey C BamberInstitute of Cancer Research, Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, United Kingdom.
Emma J HarrisInstitute of Cancer Research, Radiotherapy and Imaging, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: emma.harris@icr.ac.uk.
Susan LalondrelleRadiotherapy Department, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 19727Cancer Research UK 23557Cancer Research UK C20892/A23557Cancer Research UK C33389/A19727
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAdaptive radiation therapy strategies could account for interfractional uterine motion observed in patients with cervix cancer, but the current cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)-based treatment workflow is limited by poor soft-tissue contrast. The goal of the present study was to determine if ultrasound (US) could be used to improve visualization of the uterus, either as a single modality or in combination with CBCT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Interobserver uterine contour agreement and confidence were compared on 40 corresponding CBCT, US, and CBCT-US-fused images from 11 patients with cervix cancer. Contour agreement was measured using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and mean contour-to-contour distance (MCCD). Observers rated their contour confidence on a scale from 1 to 10. Pairwise Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to measure differences in contour agreement and confidence.

resultsCBCT-US fused images had significantly better contour agreement and confidence than either individual modality (P < .05), with median (interquartile range [IQR]) values of 0.84 (0.11), 1.26 (0.23) mm, and 7 (2) for the DSC, MCCD, and observer confidence ratings, respectively. Contour agreement was similar between US and CBCT, with median (IQR) DSCs of 0.81 (0.17) and 0.82 (0.14) and MCCDs of 1.75 (1.15) mm and 1.62 (0.74) mm. Observers were significantly more confident in their US-based contours than in their CBCT-based contours (P < .05), with median (IQR) confidence ratings of 7 (2.75) versus 5 (4).

conclusionsCBCT and US are complementary and improve uterine segmentation precision when combined. Observers could localize the uterus with a similar precision on independent US and CBCT images.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyUltrasonographyCervix UteriFemaleHumansMiddle AgedMultimodal ImagingObserver VariationRadiotherapy, Image-GuidedRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedReference StandardsSelf ConceptStatistics, NonparametricUrinary BladderUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30872145
PMCPMC6542416
OpenAlexW2920853927

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.