Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871966›Full record

ArticleClinical breast cancer2019

Patterns of Care and Efficacy of Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Skin-Involved Breast Cancers of All Sizes.

Alina M Mateo, Anna M Mazor, Lyudmila DeMora, Elin R Sigurdson, Elizabeth A Handorf, John M Daly, Allison A Aggon, Elias Obeid, Shelly B Hayes, Richard J Bleicher

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical breast cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alina M MateoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Anna M MazorDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Lyudmila DeMoraDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Elin R SigurdsonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Elizabeth A HandorfDepartment of Biostatistics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
John M DalyDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Allison A AggonDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Elias ObeidDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Shelly B HayesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Richard J BleicherDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: Richard.Bleicher@fccc.edu.
Fox Chase Cancer Center · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Dietmar J Kappes · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe management of small skin-involved (SI) invasive breast cancers is controversial because although they are considered unresectable, their prognosis is far better than their stage III classification. This study was undertaken to determine how SI lesions are treated in the United States and to discern the benefit of systemic therapy. PATIENTS AND

methodsData of patients diagnosed with stage I-III breast cancer in the National Cancer Data Base between 2004 and 2011 were reviewed. Treatment patterns were examined and overall survival assessed.

resultsA total of 3485 patients had SI and 456,287 patients had non-SI breast cancers. Chemotherapy was administered to 68.5% of SI and 45.9% of non-SI tumors (P < .001), including 77.2% of SI and 33% of non-SI tumors < 2 cm (P < .001). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, SI patients were 19.4% more likely to receive chemotherapy than non-SI patients. Radiotherapy was provided to 61.1% of SI and 64.3% of non-SI tumors (P < .001), including 65.5% of SI and 66.5% non-SI tumors < 2 cm (P = .711). After adjusting for patient and tumor characteristics, SI patients were 76.6% more likely to receive radiotherapy than non-SI patients. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy provided an overall survival benefit for stage II and III SI and non-SI tumors.

conclusionDespite controversy regarding staging and prognosis of SI tumors, the majority of patients are provided systemic therapy and radiotherapy. Varied patterns of chemotherapy administration for SI tumors suggests that further treatment guidance and standardization are required, especially because chemotherapy and radiotherapy are equally efficacious in SI and non-SI tumors alike.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CareAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBreast NeoplasmsChemoradiotherapyErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPractice Patterns, Physicians'PrognosisReceptors, EstrogenERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, EstrogenReceptors, ProgesteroneLocally advanced breast cancerLocoregional treatmentOverall survivalPractice patternsTumor size

Identifiers

PMID30871966
PMCPMC6667298
OpenAlexW2912548534

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.