Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871639›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2019

Susceptibility of wild-caught Lutzomyia longipalpis (Diptera: Psychodidae) sand flies to insecticide after an extended period of exposure in western São Paulo, Brazil.

Mikel A González, Melissa J Bell, Scott A Bernhardt, Reginaldo P Brazil, Erin Dilger, Orin Courtenay, James G C Hamilton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluation of Susceptibility Status ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2021
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Insecticide-impregnated netting: A surface treatment for killingCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Insecticide Susceptibility Status of Wild Population ofJournal of arthropod-borne diseases · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Mikel A GonzálezDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancashire, LA1 4YG, UK.
Melissa J BellDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancashire, LA1 4YG, UK.
Scott A BernhardtDepartment of Biology, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, 84322, USA.
Reginaldo P BrazilLaboratório de Doenças Parasitárias, Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Fundaçao Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, 4365, Brazil.
Erin DilgerSchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
Orin CourtenaySchool of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
James G C HamiltonDivision of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancashire, LA1 4YG, UK. j.g.hamilton@lancaster.ac.uk.
Lancaster University · GBUniversity of Warwick · GBFundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRNEIKER, the Basque Institute for Agricultural Research and Development · ESUtah State University · US

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT091689MF
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Brazil, members of the sand fly species complex Lutzomyia longipalpis transmit Leishmania infantum, a protist parasite that causes visceral leishmaniasis. Male Lu. longipalpis produce a sex pheromone that is attractive to both females and males. During a cluster randomised trial, to determine the combined effect of synthetic sex-aggregation pheromone and insecticide on Le. infantum transmission Lu. longipalpis had been continuously exposed to insecticide for 30 months. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of continuous exposure to the insecticides used in the trial on the susceptibility of Lu. longipalpis population.

methodsDuring the trial the sand flies had been exposed to either lambda-cyhalothrin [pheromone + residual insecticide spray (PI)], deltamethrin [dog collars (DC)] or no insecticide [control (C)], for 30 months (November 2012 to April 2015). The insecticide treatment regime was kept in place for an additional 12 months (May 2015-April 2016) during this susceptibility study. Sand flies collected from the field were exposed to WHO insecticide-impregnated papers cyhalothrin (0.05%), deltamethrin (0.5%) and control (silicone oil) in a modified WHO insecticide exposure trial to determine their susceptibility.

resultsWe collected 788 Lu. longipalpis using CDC-light traps in 31 municipalities across the three trial arms. Probit analysis showed that the knockdown times (KDTs) of Lu. longipalpis collected from the lambda-cyhalothrin exposed PI-arm [KDT

conclusionsOur study reveals slight changes in KDT, in sand flies after prolonged exposure to lambda-cyhalothrin in the presence of pheromone. These changes are not considered to have reached the reference levels indicative of resistance in sand flies suggesting that pheromone and insecticide treatment at the level indicated in this study do not constitute a significant risk of increased insecticide resistance. Prolonged exposure to deltamethrin in dog collars did not result in changes to KDT.

Indexed as

Insecticide ResistanceInsecticidesLeishmaniasis, VisceralMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsPsychodidaeAnimalsFemaleLeishmania infantumMaleNitrilesPyrethrinsSex AttractantsTime FactorscyhalothrindecamethrinInsecticidesNitrilesPyrethrinsSex AttractantsBrazilInsecticide susceptibilityKDTLambda-cyhalothrinLong-exposureLutzomyia longipalpisSex-aggregation pheromone

Identifiers

PMID30871639
PMCPMC6419423
OpenAlexW2922337609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.