Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871632›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2019

The PACE trial of treatments for chronic fatigue syndrome: a response to WILSHIRE et al.

Michael Sharpe, Kim Goldsmith, Trudie Chalder

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michael SharpeUniversity of Oxford Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK. Michael.Sharpe@psych.ox.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6474-9980
Kim GoldsmithBiostatistics & Health Informatics Department, Division of Psychology and Systems Sciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Trudie ChalderAcademic Department of Psychological Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

Department of Health DRF-2011-04-061Medical Research Council G0200434
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS) is chronic disabling illness characterized by severe disabling fatigue, typically made worse by exertion. Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME) is thought by some to be the same disorder (then referred to as CFS/ME) and by others to be different. There is an urgent need to find effective treatments for CFS. The UK Medical Research Council PACE trial published in 2011 compared available treatments and concluded that when added to specialist medical care, cognitive behaviour therapy and graded exercise therapy were more effective in improving both fatigue and physical function in participants with CFS, than both adaptive pacing therapy and specialised medical care alone. In this paper, we respond to the methodological criticisms of the trial and a reanalysis of the trial data reported by Wilshire at al. We conclude that neither the criticisms nor the reanalysis offer any convincing reason to change the conclusions of the PACE trial.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicCognitive Behavioral TherapyExercise TherapyFatigue Syndrome, ChronicHumansTreatment OutcomeChronic fatigue syndromeClinical trialCognitive behaviour therapyGraded exercise therapyMethodology

Identifiers

PMID30871632
PMCPMC6419398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.