ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019
Evaluating in vivo efficacy - toxicity profile of TEG001 in humanized mice xenografts against primary human AML disease and healthy hematopoietic cells.
Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Integrated Method to Evaluate the Treatment Efficacy and Immunogenicity of B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Therapeutic Enzyme Formulations.Small methods · 2026Article
- T cell immunotherapy for solid tumors: limitations, progress, and future prospects.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Autologous profiling reveals inter-patient heterogeneity in Vδ2Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Disrupting the balance between activating and inhibitory receptors of γδT cells for effective cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2025Review
- Current developments in T-cell receptor therapy for acute myeloid leukemia.Blood advances · 2025Review
- Mechanisms and Functions of γδ T Cells in Tumor Cell Recognition.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2025Review
- γδ T cells in hematological malignancies: mechanisms and therapeutic strategies.Blood science (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Review
- Cancer immunotherapy by γδ T cells.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Review
- A murine model to evaluate immunotherapy effectiveness for human Fanconi anemia-mutated acute myeloid leukemia.PloS one · 2024Article
- Therapeutic avenues for γδ T cells in cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023Review
- γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Anti-PD-1 antibody armored γδ T cells enhance anti-tumor efficacy in ovarian cancer.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Article
- Spontaneous tumor regression mediated by human T cells in a humanized immune system mouse model.Communications biology · 2023Article
- The emerging roles of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023Review
- γδ T cells in immunotherapies for B-cell malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Uncovering the mode of action of engineered T cells in patient cancer organoids.Nature biotechnology · 2023Article
- Vγ9Vδ2 T-cell immunotherapy in blood cancers: ready for prime time?Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Strategies to improve γδTCRs engineered T-cell therapies for the treatment of solid malignancies.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
- Beyond αβ T cells: NK, iNKT, and γδT cell biology in leukemic patients and potential for off-the-shelf adoptive cell therapies for AML.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundγ9δ2T cells, which express Vγ9 and Vδ2 chains of the T cell receptor (TCR), mediate cancer immune surveillance by sensing early metabolic changes in malignant leukemic blast and not their healthy hematopoietic stem counterparts via the γ9δ2TCR targeting joined conformational and spatial changes of CD277 at the cell membrane (CD277J). This concept led to the development of next generation CAR-T cells, so-called TEGs: αβT cells Engineered to express a defined γδTCR. The high affinity γ9δ2TCR clone 5 has recently been selected within the TEG format as a clinical candidate (TEG001). However, exploring safety and efficacy against a target, which reflects an early metabolic change in tumor cells, remains challenging given the lack of appropriate tools. Therefore, we tested whether TEG001 is able to eliminate established leukemia in a primary disease model, without harming other parts of the healthy hematopoiesis in vivo.
methodsSeparate sets of NSG mice were respectively injected with primary human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and cord blood-derived human progenitor cells from healthy donors. These mice were then treated with TEG001 and mock cells. Tumor burden and human cells engraftment were measured in peripheral blood and followed up over time by quantifying for absolute cell number by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric 2-tailed Mann-Whitney t-test.
resultsWe successfully engrafted primary AML blasts and healthy hematopoietic cells after 6-8 weeks. Here we report that metabolic cancer targeting through TEG001 eradicated established primary leukemic blasts in vivo, while healthy hematopoietic compartments derived from human cord-blood remained unharmed in spite of TEGs persistence up to 50 days after infusion. No additional signs of off-target toxicity were observed in any other tissues.
conclusionWithin the limitations of humanized PD-X models, targeting CD277J by TEG001 is safe and efficient. Therefore, we have initiated clinical testing of TEG001 in a phase I first-in-human clinical trial (NTR6541; date of registration 25 July 2017).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.