Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871629›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2019

Evaluating in vivo efficacy - toxicity profile of TEG001 in humanized mice xenografts against primary human AML disease and healthy hematopoietic cells.

Inez Johanna, Trudy Straetemans, Sabine Heijhuurs, Tineke Aarts-Riemens, Håkan Norell, Laura Bongiovanni, Alain de Bruin, Zsolt Sebestyen, Jürgen Kuball

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Autologous profiling reveals inter-patient heterogeneity in Vδ2Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cancer immunotherapy by γδ T cells.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Therapeutic avenues for γδ T cells in cancer.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2023
    Review
  11. γδ T cells: origin and fate, subsets, diseases and immunotherapy.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The emerging roles of γδ T cells in cancer immunotherapy.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 4 countries.

Inez JohannaDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Trudy StraetemansDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sabine HeijhuursDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tineke Aarts-RiemensDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Håkan NorellFaculdade de Medicina, Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Laura BongiovanniDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dutch Molecular Pathology Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alain de BruinDepartment of Pathobiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Dutch Molecular Pathology Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Zsolt SebestyenDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jürgen KuballDepartment of Hematology and Laboratory of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. j.h.e.kuball@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUniversity of Veterinary Medicine · HUFundação Faculdade de Medicina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundγ9δ2T cells, which express Vγ9 and Vδ2 chains of the T cell receptor (TCR), mediate cancer immune surveillance by sensing early metabolic changes in malignant leukemic blast and not their healthy hematopoietic stem counterparts via the γ9δ2TCR targeting joined conformational and spatial changes of CD277 at the cell membrane (CD277J). This concept led to the development of next generation CAR-T cells, so-called TEGs: αβT cells Engineered to express a defined γδTCR. The high affinity γ9δ2TCR clone 5 has recently been selected within the TEG format as a clinical candidate (TEG001). However, exploring safety and efficacy against a target, which reflects an early metabolic change in tumor cells, remains challenging given the lack of appropriate tools. Therefore, we tested whether TEG001 is able to eliminate established leukemia in a primary disease model, without harming other parts of the healthy hematopoiesis in vivo.

methodsSeparate sets of NSG mice were respectively injected with primary human acute myeloid leukemia (AML) blasts and cord blood-derived human progenitor cells from healthy donors. These mice were then treated with TEG001 and mock cells. Tumor burden and human cells engraftment were measured in peripheral blood and followed up over time by quantifying for absolute cell number by flow cytometry. Statistical analysis was performed using non-parametric 2-tailed Mann-Whitney t-test.

resultsWe successfully engrafted primary AML blasts and healthy hematopoietic cells after 6-8 weeks. Here we report that metabolic cancer targeting through TEG001 eradicated established primary leukemic blasts in vivo, while healthy hematopoietic compartments derived from human cord-blood remained unharmed in spite of TEGs persistence up to 50 days after infusion. No additional signs of off-target toxicity were observed in any other tissues.

conclusionWithin the limitations of humanized PD-X models, targeting CD277J by TEG001 is safe and efficient. Therefore, we have initiated clinical testing of TEG001 in a phase I first-in-human clinical trial (NTR6541; date of registration 25 July 2017).

Indexed as

AnimalsAntigens, CDAntineoplastic AgentsBlood CellsButyrophilinsCell Line, TumorDisease Models, AnimalHematopoiesisHematopoietic Stem CellsHistocytochemistryHumansMiceXenograft Model Antitumor AssaysAntigens, CDAntineoplastic AgentsBTN3A1 protein, humanButyrophilinsAMLImmunotherapyMice modelPreclinicalTCR engineeringTEGsToxicity

Identifiers

PMID30871629
PMCPMC6419469
OpenAlexW2936164107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.