Trial reportCritical care (London, England)2019
Transfusion requirements after head trauma: a randomized feasibility controlled trial.
Trial report in Critical care (London, England), 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02203292 (Transfusion Requirements After Head Trauma), which is not on this map. Cited by 50 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Transfusion Requirements After Head Trauma
Who cites it
50 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 112 citations in OpenAlex.
- Red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical patients: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Restrictive vs. Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Neurocritical care · 2026Pooled it
- Liberal versus restrictive red blood cell transfusion thresholds in acute acquired brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2025Pooled it
- Liberal transfusion strategies reduce sepsis risk and improve neurological recovery in acute brain injury: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Pooled it
- Red blood cell transfusion strategy in traumatic brain injury patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Liberal vs. restrictive transfusion strategies for acute brain injury: a systematic review and frequentist-Bayesian meta-analysis.Intensive care medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Red blood cell transfusion in neurocritical patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition.Critical care (London, England) · 2023Guideline
- Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Transfusion strategies in non-bleeding critically ill adults: a clinical practice guideline from the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine.Intensive care medicine · 2020Guideline
- Pooled it
- Restrictive vs Liberal Transfusion Strategy in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Secondary Analysis of the TRAIN Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
- Trial
- Anemia From Inflammation After Intracerebral Hemorrhage and Relationships With Outcome.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2024Trial
- Timing of Transfusion Strategy Initiation in Acute Brain Injury: A Subanalysis of the TRAIN Study.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- A Meta-epidemiologic Analysis of Differences in Treatment-Effect Estimates According to Outcome Scale (GOS vs. GOSE) in Moderate-to-Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Trials.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- The Impact of Hemoglobin Transfusion Thresholds in Moderate-to-Severe Blunt Traumatic Brain Injury on 6-Month Neurologic Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Neurology international · 2026Article
- Blood Product Transfusion and Coagulopathy in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury: A Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Liberal Versus Restrictive Blood Transfusion Strategies in Neurocritical Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Critical care research and practice · 2026Article
- Current perspectives and updates on transfusion strategies in critically ill anemic patients.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnemia is frequent among patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and is associated with an increased risk of poor outcome. The optimal hemoglobin concentration to trigger red blood cell (RBC) transfusion in patients with TBI is not clearly defined.
methodsAll eligible consecutive adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with moderate or severe TBI were randomized to a "restrictive" (hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL), or a "liberal" (threshold 9 g/dL) transfusion strategy. The transfusion strategy was continued for up to 14 days or until ICU discharge. The primary outcome was the mean difference in hemoglobin between groups. Secondary outcomes included transfusion requirements, intracranial pressure management, cerebral hemodynamics, length of stay, mortality and 6-month neurological outcome.
resultsA total of 44 patients were randomized, 21 patients to the liberal group and 23 to the restrictive group. There were no baseline differences between the groups. The mean hemoglobin concentrations during the 14-day period were 8.4 ± 1.0 and 9.3 ± 1.3 (p < 0.01) in the restrictive and liberal groups, respectively. Fewer RBC units were administered in the restrictive than in the liberal group (35 vs. 66, p = 0.02). There was negative correlation (r = - 0.265, p < 0.01) between hemoglobin concentration and middle cerebral artery flow velocity as evaluated by transcranial Doppler ultrasound and the incidence of post-traumatic vasospasm was significantly lower in the liberal strategy group (4/21, 3% vs. 15/23, 65%; p < 0.01). Hospital mortality was higher in the restrictive than in the liberal group (7/23 vs. 1/21; p = 0.048) and the liberal group tended to have a better neurological status at 6 months (p = 0.06).
conclusionsThe trial reached feasibility criteria. The restrictive group had lower hemoglobin concentrations and received fewer RBC transfusions. Hospital mortality was lower and neurological status at 6 months favored the liberal group.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02203292 . Registered on 29 July 2014.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.