Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871566›Full record

SynthesisVirology journal2019

Sofosbuvir-based regimen is safe and effective for hepatitis C infected patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mingshu Li, Jun Chen, Zhixiong Fang, Yi Li, Qian Lin

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Virology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. SASLT guidelines: Update in treatment of hepatitis C virus infection, 2024.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mingshu LiXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, Hunan, China.
Jun ChenDepartment of Liver Diseases, The Third People's Hospital of Shenzhen, 29 Bulan Road, Shenzhen, 518114, Guangdong, China.
Zhixiong FangDepartment of Infectious Disease, XiangTan City Central Hospital, 120 Heping Road, Xiangtan, 411100, Hunan, China.
Yi LiDepartment of Infectious Disease, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, 139 Renmin Road, Changsha, 410011, Hunan, China. liyi731128@csu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0001-7994-5362
Qian LinXiangya School of Public Health, Central South University, 110 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410078, Hunan, China. lin.qian@foxmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhether sofosbuvir is suitable for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients with severe renal impairment is inconclusive. This systematic review aims to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of SOF-based regimen in the setting of stage 4 and 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD).

methodsWe conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE and Google Scholar with searching strategy: (sofosbuvir OR Sovaldi OR Harvoni OR Epclusa OR Vosevi) AND (severe kidney impairment OR severe renal impairment OR end-stage renal disease OR dialysis OR renal failure OR ESRD OR renal insufficiency OR hepatorenal syndrome OR HRS). Sustained virological response (SVR12/24) rate and serious adverse event (SAE) rate with 95% confidence intervals were aggregated. Subgroup analysis was implemented to evaluate the impact of treatment strategy and patient characteristics.

resultsTwenty-one studies met inclusion criteria, totaling 717 HCV infected patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 (58.4% on dialysis). Pooled SVR12/24 was 97.1% (95% CI 93.9-99.3%), and SAE rate was 4.8% (95% CI 2.1-10.3%). There was no significant difference at SVR12/24 (97.1% vs 96.2%, p = 0.72) or SAE rate (8.8% vs 2.9%, p = 0.13) between subgroups applying full or decreased dose of sofosbuvir. Cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients achieved comparable sustained virological response (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.85-1.02). Four studies reported eGFR/serum creatinine pre- and post- treatment, with no significant modification.

conclusionsOur study suggests SOF-based regimen might be used safely and effectively in patients living with HCV infection/stage 4-5 CKD, with normal and reduced dose of sofosbuvir. Prospective and well-controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42018107440 .

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsDrug Therapy, CombinationGenotypeHepacivirusHepatitis CHepatitis C, ChronicHumansKidney Failure, ChronicProspective StudiesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicRibavirinSofosbuvirSustained Virologic ResponseAntiviral AgentsRibavirinSofosbuvirDoseHCV infectionMeta-analysisSofosbuvirStage 4–5 chronic kidney disease

Identifiers

PMID30871566
PMCPMC6419462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.