Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871513›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2019

Interprofessional collaboration in diabetes care: perceptions of family physicians practicing in or not in a primary health care team.

Olga Szafran, Sandra L Kennett, Neil R Bell, Jacqueline M I Torti

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
23.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Insulin Injection Practices in a Population of Canadians with Diabetes: An Observational Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. [Training of human resources for universal health: strategic actions from academic institutions].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Olga SzafranDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, 6-10 University Terrace, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada. olga.szafran@ualberta.ca.
Sandra L KennettEdmonton Oliver Primary Care Network, Family Medicine Clinic, Misericordia Community Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Neil R BellDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Family Medicine Clinic, Misericordia Community Hospital, 16940 - 87 Avenue, Edmonton, Alberta, T5R 4H5, Canada.
Jacqueline M I TortiDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Alberta, Health Sciences Addition Room 110, London, Ontario, N6A 5C1, Canada.
Misericordia Community Hospital · CAUniversity of Alberta · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn Canada, most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are cared for in the primary care setting in the practices of family physicians. This care is delivered through a variety of practice models ranging from a single practitioner to interprofessional team models of care. This study examined the extent to which family physicians collaborate with other health professionals in the care of patients with T2DM, comparing those who are part of an interprofessional health care team called a Primary Care Network (PCN) to those who are not part of a PCN.

methodsFamily physicians in Alberta, Canada were surveyed to ascertain: which health professionals they refer to or have collaborative arrangements with when caring for T2DM patients; satisfaction and confidence with other professionals' involvement in diabetes care; and perceived effects of having other professionals involved in diabetes care. Chi-squared and Fishers Exact tests were used to test for differences between PCN and non-PCN physicians.

results170 (34%) family physicians responded to the survey, of whom 127 were PCN physicians and 41 were non-PCN physicians (2 not recorded). A significantly greater proportion of PCN physicians vs non-PCN physicians referred patients to pharmacists (23.6% vs 2.6%) or had collaborative working arrangements with diabetes educators (55.3% vs 18.4%), dietitians (54.5% vs 21.1%), or pharmacists (43.1% vs 21.1%), respectively. Regardless of PCN status, family physicians expressed greater satisfaction and confidence in specialists than in other family physicians or health professionals in medication management of patients with T2DM. Physicians who were affiliated with a PCN perceived that interprofessional collaboration enabled them to delegate diabetes education and monitoring and/or adjustment of medications to other health professionals and resulted in improved patient care.

conclusionsThis study sheds new insight on the influence that being part of a primary care team has on physicians' practice. Specifically, supporting physicians' access to other health professionals in the primary care setting is perceived to facilitate interprofessional collaboration in the care of patients with T2DM and improve patient care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCooperative BehaviorHealth EducatorsNutritionistsPatient Care TeamPharmacistsPhysicians, FamilyAdultAgedCanadaDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansInterprofessional RelationsMaleMiddle AgedCanadaFamily physiciansFamily practiceInterprofessional health teamPrimary health careType 2 diabetes mellitus

Identifiers

PMID30871513
PMCPMC6419394
OpenAlexW2937540642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.