ArticleBMC family practice2019
Interprofessional collaboration in diabetes care: perceptions of family physicians practicing in or not in a primary health care team.
Article in BMC family practice, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 87 citations in OpenAlex.
- Facilitators and Barriers to Effective Implementation of Interprofessional Care for Type 2 Diabetes in the Elderly Population of the Southern Africa Development Community: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Pooled it
- The bigger, the better? A systematic review on the impact of mergers on primary care organizations.European journal of public health · 2021Pooled it
- Primary care insights on the management of diabetes: results from a mixed method study of care changes and impacts during the COVID-19 pandemic.Family practice · 2025Article
- Assessment of oral health status and practice among diabetic and nondiabetic participants.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- The Development of an Assessment Instrument for Behavior Toward Hypoglycemia Risk Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Outpatients in Jakarta, Indonesia.Journal of preventive medicine and public health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi · 2025Article
- Perspectives of humanitarian actors on interprofessional care for persons living with diabetes: Lessons from Aleppo, Syria.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Importance of interprofessional collaboration in teaching diabetic foot self-management: Perceptions of health care professionals.Medical journal, Armed Forces India · 2024Article
- Building High-Performing Primary Care Systems: After a Decade of Policy Change, Is Canada "Walking the Talk?"The Milbank quarterly · 2023Review
- Nutritional Knowledge, Confidence, Attitudes towards Nutritional Care and Nutrition Counselling Practice among General Practitioners.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Underuse of cardiorenal protective agents in high-risk diabetes patients in primary care: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Interprofessional care of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care: family physicians' perspectives.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Barriers and Facilitators in Access to Diabetes, Hypertension, and Dyslipidemia Medicines: A Scoping Review.Public health reviews · 2022Article
- Enhancing Student Knowledge of Diabetes through Virtual Choose Your Own Adventure Patient Case Format.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Collaborative care model for diabetes in primary care settings in Qatar: a qualitative exploration among healthcare professionals and patients who experienced the service.BMC health services research · 2021Article
- Insulin Injection Practices in a Population of Canadians with Diabetes: An Observational Study.Diabetes therapy : research, treatment and education of diabetes and related disorders · 2020Article
- Could the connectedness of primary health care workers involved in social networks affect their job burnout? A cross-sectional study in six counties, Central China.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Observational
- [Training of human resources for universal health: strategic actions from academic institutions].Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2020Article
- Integrating Community Care for the Prevention and Treatment of Diabetes.International journal of integrated careArticle
- Where Does the Patient Fit? An Analysis of Word Use Within the Context of Interprofessional Collaborative Care.Global qualitative nursing researchArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Canada, most patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are cared for in the primary care setting in the practices of family physicians. This care is delivered through a variety of practice models ranging from a single practitioner to interprofessional team models of care. This study examined the extent to which family physicians collaborate with other health professionals in the care of patients with T2DM, comparing those who are part of an interprofessional health care team called a Primary Care Network (PCN) to those who are not part of a PCN.
methodsFamily physicians in Alberta, Canada were surveyed to ascertain: which health professionals they refer to or have collaborative arrangements with when caring for T2DM patients; satisfaction and confidence with other professionals' involvement in diabetes care; and perceived effects of having other professionals involved in diabetes care. Chi-squared and Fishers Exact tests were used to test for differences between PCN and non-PCN physicians.
results170 (34%) family physicians responded to the survey, of whom 127 were PCN physicians and 41 were non-PCN physicians (2 not recorded). A significantly greater proportion of PCN physicians vs non-PCN physicians referred patients to pharmacists (23.6% vs 2.6%) or had collaborative working arrangements with diabetes educators (55.3% vs 18.4%), dietitians (54.5% vs 21.1%), or pharmacists (43.1% vs 21.1%), respectively. Regardless of PCN status, family physicians expressed greater satisfaction and confidence in specialists than in other family physicians or health professionals in medication management of patients with T2DM. Physicians who were affiliated with a PCN perceived that interprofessional collaboration enabled them to delegate diabetes education and monitoring and/or adjustment of medications to other health professionals and resulted in improved patient care.
conclusionsThis study sheds new insight on the influence that being part of a primary care team has on physicians' practice. Specifically, supporting physicians' access to other health professionals in the primary care setting is perceived to facilitate interprofessional collaboration in the care of patients with T2DM and improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.