Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30871116›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2019

Production Phase Affects the Bioaerosol MicrobialComposition and Functional Potential in SwineConfinement Buildings.

Honglin Yan, Li Zhang, Zhendong Guo, Hongfu Zhang, Jingbo Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Antibiotic Resistance: From Pig to Meat.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Journal of animal science and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Honglin YanSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010, China. honglinyan@swust.edu.cn.
Li ZhangSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010, China. faswust@126.com.
Zhendong GuoKey Labortatory of Jilin Province for Zoonosis Prevention and Control, Veterinary Research Institute,Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Changchun 130122, China. guozd@foxmail.com.
Hongfu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Sciences, Chinese Academy of AgriculturalSciences, Beijing 100000, China. zhanghfcaas@gmail.com.
Jingbo LiuSchool of Life Science and Engineering, Southwest University of Science and Technology,Mianyang 621010, China. liuswust@163.com.

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2016YFD0500505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bioaerosols from swine confinement buildings (SCBs) pose a challenge to public health,and microorganisms within the SCBs bioaerosols originate from swine feces, of which the microbialcomposition is associated with the production phase. The present study adopted the wholemetagenome shotgun sequencing approach, to assess the effects of the production phase on thecomposition and functional potential of microbial populations in SCBs bioaerosols. Most annotatedproteins were assigned into domain bacteria, within which the predominant phylum was Firmicutes.The taxonomical profiles of bioaerosols from different types of piggeries showed that buildingshousing weaning piglets (WP) exhibited higher abundances of Bacteroidetes and Proteobacteria thanbuildings housing finishing pigs (FP), gestating sows (GS), farrowing sows (FS), and breeding boars(BB). Regarding the functional potential, the WP bioaerosol had more genes involved in the proteinturnover and fewer genes involved in the carbohydrate metabolism than bioaerosols from othertypes of SCBs. Furthermore, production phase influenced the antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs)profile of the SCBs bioaerosols. Bioaerosol microbiome of BB, shared a high similarity with GS, andWP bioaerosol microbiome was more similar to FP than other types of SCBs. Our study suggeststhat the production phase plays a key role in the SCBs bioaerosol microbiome.

Indexed as

bioaerosolmicrobiomeproduction phaseswine confinement buildings

Identifiers

PMID30871116
PMCPMC6466638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.