Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870524›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2019

Mode of delivery and preterm birth in subsequent births: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yinghui Zhang, Jie Zhou, Yubo Ma, Li Liu, Qing Xia, Dazhi Fan, Wen Ai

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04554745 (The Assessment of Cervical Length and Thickness of Cesarean Section Scar as Predictors for Preterm Labor in Patients With Previous Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04554745 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Assessment of Cervical Length and Thickness of Cesarean Section Scar as Predictors for Preterm Labor in Patients With Previous Cesarean Section

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2021 to 2022Enrolled260ConditionsPreterm LaborArmsUltrasound
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Yinghui ZhangDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Jie ZhouDepartment of Pediatrics, Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Yubo MaDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China.
Li LiuDepartment of Library, the First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Qing XiaMenzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania Australia.
Dazhi FanFoshan Institute of Fetal Medicine, Southern Medical University Affiliated Maternal & Child Health Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, Guangdong, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-9166
Wen AiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Foshan Chancheng Central Hospital, Foshan, Guangdong, China.
Xian Central Hospital · CNAnhui Medical University · CNFoshan Maternity and Child Health Care Hospital · CNUniversity of Tasmania · AUZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Preterm birth continues to be an important problem in modern obstetrics and a large public health concern and is related to increased risk for neonatal morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the data in the literature to determine the relationships between mode of delivery (cesarean section and vaginal birth) in the first pregnancy and the risk of subsequent preterm birth from a multi-year population based cohorts (PROSPERO registration number: 42018090788). Five electronic databases were searched. Observational studies that provided mode of delivery and subsequent preterm birth were eligible. Ten cohort studies, involving 10333501 women, were included in this study. Compared with vaginal delivery, women delivering by previous cesarean section had a significantly higher risk of preterm birth in subsequent births (RR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.20). After adjusting confounding factors, there was still statistical significance (aRR 1.12, 95%CI 1.01-1.24). However, both before and after adjustment, there was no difference among very preterm birth (RR 1.14, 95%CI 0.90-1.43; aRR 1.16, 95%CI 0.80-1.68; respectively). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis that suggests previous cesarean section could increase the risk of preterm birth in subsequent pregnancies. The result could provide policy makers, clinicians, and expectant parents to reduce the occurrence of unnecessary cesarean section.

Indexed as

Birth InjuriesCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyPremature Birth

Identifiers

PMID30870524
PMCPMC6417656
OpenAlexW2921247512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.