Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870497›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2019

Factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women attending public hospitals in Tigray region, Ethiopia, 2018; Case control study.

Hirut Teame, Lemlem Gebremariam, Tsega Kahsay, Kidanemaryam Berhe, Gdiom Gebreheat, Gebrehiwot Gebremariam

Abstract readClinical TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hirut TeameDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0002-7519-8133
Lemlem GebremariamDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Tsega KahsayDepartment of Medical Laboratory Technology, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Kidanemaryam BerheDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.
Gdiom GebreheatDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1775-8216
Gebrehiwot GebremariamDepartment of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Science, Adigrat University, Adigrat, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidence and mortality of cervical cancer is the leading cancer among women in Ethiopia. Absence of effective detection methods and treatment strategies is a major reason for the sharply rising cervical cancer rates in developing countries.

objectiveTo determine factors affecting utilization of cervical cancer screening services among women attending public hospitals in Tigray region in 2018.

methodsHospital based unmatched case control study was applied with sample size of 312 cases and 312 controls. Data was entered to Epi data version 3.1 and exported to SPSS version 20. The odds ratio with their 95% confidence interval, two-tailed P value was calculated. Variables with P value ≤ 0.05 in the bivariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression model.

resultsBeing in the age group of 30-39 and 40-49 years were two and four times more likely to utilize cervical cancer screening than those who were 21-29 years (AOR = 2.15 95%CI:1.11, 4.17 and AOR = 3.86 95%CI:1.48, 10.06) respectively. Current occupation with governmental and private employee were four and three times more likely to utilize the screening service than those housewife respectively (AOR = 3.85 95%CI: 1.87, 7.92 and AOR = 3.17 95%CI: 1.31, 7.66). Having ever given birth and history of multiple sexual partners were more likely to utilize the screening service (AOR = 2.57 95%CI: 1.02, 6.50) and (AOR = 2.65 95%CI: 1.10, 6.40) respectively.

conclusionsThere is a need to strengthen policy and guidelines on cervical cancer screening among women particularly with regarding age group of 21-29, current occupation with housewife, single sexual partner and null parity. All stakeholders should give priority on the promotion and initiation of women to acquired good knowledge and attitude on cervical cancer screening.

Indexed as

Hospitals, PublicMass ScreeningAdultCase-Control StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMiddle AgedParitySexual BehaviorSocioeconomic FactorsUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID30870497
PMCPMC6417770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.