Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870466›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Interaction of POPC, DPPC, and POPE with the μ opioid receptor: A coarse-grained molecular dynamics study.

Marie-Ange Angladon, Mathieu Fossépré, Laurence Leherte, Daniel P Vercauteren

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TBM preferred to AlphaFold 3 for functional models of insect odorant receptors.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Protons taken hostage: Dynamic H-bond networks of the pH-sensing GPR68.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Marie-Ange AngladonLaboratoire de Physico-Chimie Informatique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, Namur Medecine and Drug Innovation Center (NAMEDIC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur (UNamur), Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-7205-3705
Mathieu FossépréLaboratoire de Physico-Chimie Informatique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, Namur Medecine and Drug Innovation Center (NAMEDIC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur (UNamur), Namur, Belgium.
Laurence LeherteLaboratoire de Physico-Chimie Informatique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, Namur Medecine and Drug Innovation Center (NAMEDIC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur (UNamur), Namur, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8468-5462
Daniel P VercauterenLaboratoire de Physico-Chimie Informatique, Unité de Chimie Physique Théorique et Structurale, Namur Medecine and Drug Innovation Center (NAMEDIC), Namur Research Institute for Life Sciences (NARILIS), University of Namur (UNamur), Namur, Belgium.
University of Namur · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The μ opioid receptor (μOR), which is part of the G protein-coupled receptors family, is a membrane protein that is modulated by its lipid environment. In the present work, we model μOR in three different membrane systems: POPC (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine), POPE (1-palmitoyl-2-oleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine), and DPPC (1, 2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine) through 45 μs molecular dynamics (MD) simulations at the coarse-grained level. Our theoretical studies provide new insights to the lipid-induced modulation of the receptor. Particularly, to characterize how μOR interacts with each lipid, we analyze the tilt of the protein, the number of contacts occurring between the lipids and each amino acid of the receptor, and the μOR-lipid interface described as a network graph. We also analyze the variations in the number and the nature of the protein contacts that are induced by the lipid structure. We show that POPC interacts preferentially with helix 1 (H1) and helices H5-H6, POPE, with H5-H6 and H6-H7, and DPPC, with H4 and H6. We demonstrate how each of the three lipids shape the structure of the μOR.

Indexed as

1,2-DipalmitoylphosphatidylcholineLipid BilayersLipidsMolecular Dynamics SimulationPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesPhospholipidsProtein BindingProtein ConformationReceptors, Opioid, mu1,2-Dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylcholine1-palmitoyl-2-oleoylphosphatidylethanolamineLipid BilayersLipidsPhosphatidylcholinesPhosphatidylethanolaminesPhospholipidsReceptors, Opioid, mu

Identifiers

PMID30870466
PMCPMC6417715
OpenAlexW2921477495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.