ArticlePloS one2019
Reproducibility of sublingual microcirculation parameters obtained from sidestream darkfield imaging.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of the sublingual microcirculation with the GlycoCheck system: Reproducibility and examination conditions.PloS one · 2020Trial
- Sublingual Sidestream Dark Field (SDF) Microscopy With GlycoCheck Analysis in Individuals With and Without Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Disease.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Reproducibility of glycocheck measurements in patients under general anesthesia with muscle relaxants: A prospective observational study.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2025Observational
- Albumin Enhances Microvascular Reactivity in Sepsis: Insights from Near-Infrared Spectroscopy and Vascular Occlusion Testing.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Association of Gestational Diabetes With Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease.JACC. Advances · 2024Article
- Is handheld video microscopy really the future of microcirculation monitoring?Critical care (London, England) · 2023Article
- Identifying a sublingual triangle as the ideal site for assessment of sublingual microcirculation.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2023Article
- Assessment of the microvascular perfusion using sidestream dark-field imaging in healthy newborn foals.Veterinary medicine and science · 2023Article
- Effects of Fluids on the Sublingual Microcirculation in Sepsis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Variability of microcirculatory measurements in healthy volunteers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- The Role of the Glycocalyx in the Pathophysiology of Subarachnoid Hemorrhage-Induced Delayed Cerebral Ischemia.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021Review
- Role of albumin in the preservation of endothelial glycocalyx integrity and the microcirculation: a review.Annals of intensive care · 2020Review
- Point-of-care microcirculation evaluated with sidestream dark field technology: agreement and comparison between sublingual and sublabial mucosa.American journal of translational research · 2020Article
- Uncoupling of Microvascular Blood Flow and Capillary Density in Vascular Cognitive Impairment.Frontiers in neurology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChanges in the microcirculation may be used as a surrogate outcome in studies on cardiovascular disease. We assessed the reliability characteristics of the sublingual microcirculation parameters Vascular Density (VD), Red Blood Cell Filling (RBCF), and Perfused Boundary Region (PBR) as obtained by sidestream darkfield imaging.
methodsFor each of the three parameters, the variance components of measurement, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC), the Standard Error of Measurement, and the limits of agreement were estimated for the intra-rater setting (N = 50) and the inter-rater setting (N = 48). Subsequently, as a proof of concept, the reliability measures were used for a power analysis to design studies to evaluate the effect of acute stimuli-i.e. having a meal (N = 50) and cigarette smoking (N = 21) on the three parameters.
resultsReproducibility was poor for all three parameters. The intra-rater ICC for 2 measurements was 0.28 (95% CI: 0.04, 0.53) for the VD, 0.51 (95% CI: 0.27, 0.69) for the RBCF, and 0.33 (95% CI: 0.08-0.56) for the PBR. The standard errors of measurement and the limits of agreement for all three parameters were larger than most statistically significant intra-individual or inter-individual differences reported in previous studies. The proofs of concept showed that sample sizes in excess of 600 subjects are necessary to reach statistical significance for the observed effects of having a meal or smoking on VD and PBR.
conclusionsThe reliability of the three sublingual microcirculation parameters in their current form appears to be low and a large sample size is advisable for their use in conditions similar to those we describe.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.