Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870446›Full record

ArticlePloS one2019

Social network analysis of obsidian artefacts and Māori interaction in northern Aotearoa New Zealand.

Thegn N Ladefoged, Caleb Gemmell, Mark McCoy, Alex Jorgensen, Hayley Glover, Christopher Stevenson, Dion O'Neale

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Thegn N LadefogedAnthropology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6950-9898
Caleb GemmellPhysics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Mark McCoyAnthropology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Alex JorgensenAnthropology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Hayley GloverAnthropology, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Christopher StevensonAnthropology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America.
Dion O'NealeTe Pūnaha Matatini, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3827-3480

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the span of some 700 years the colonizing populations of Aotearoa New Zealand grew, with subsequent changes in levels of interaction and social affiliation. Historical accounts document that Māori society transformed from relatively autonomous village-based groups into larger territorial lineages, which later formed even larger geo-political tribal associations. These shifts have not been well-documented in the archaeological record, but social network analysis (SNA) of pXRF sourced obsidian recovered from 15 archaeological sites documents variable levels of similarity and affiliation. Three site communities and two source communities are defined based on the differential proportions of obsidian from 13 distinct sources. Distance and travel time between archaeological sites and obsidian sources were not the defining factors for obsidian source selection and community membership, rather social considerations are implicated. Some archaeological sites incorporated material from far off sources, and in some instances geographically close sites contained material from different sources and were assigned to different communities. The analytical site communities constitute relational identifications that partially correspond to categorical identities of current Māori iwi (tribal) territories and boundaries. Based on very limited temporal information, these site communities are thought to have coalesced sometime after AD 1500. By incorporating previously published and unpublished data, the SNA of obsidian artefacts defined robust network communities that reflect differential levels of Māori interaction and affiliation.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyGlassHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHumansNew ZealandRadiometric DatingSocial Networkingobsidian

Identifiers

PMID30870446
PMCPMC6417682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.