Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30870322›Full record

ArticleSexually transmitted diseases2019

Monitoring HIV Preexposure Prophylaxis Use Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Washington State: Findings From an Internet-Based Survey.

Darcy White Rao, Jason Carr, Kelly Naismith, Julia E Hood, James P Hughes, Martina Morris, Steven M Goodreau, Eli S Rosenberg, Matthew R Golden

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexually transmitted diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Darcy White Rao
Jason CarrInfectious Disease Assessment Unit, Disease Control and Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia.
Kelly NaismithInfectious Disease Assessment Unit, Disease Control and Health Statistics, Washington State Department of Health, Olympia.
Julia E HoodPublic Health-Seattle and King County HIV/STD Program.
James P HughesBiostatistics.
Martina Morris
Steven M Goodreau
Eli S RosenbergDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University at Albany School of Public Health, State University of New York, Rensselaer, NY.
Matthew R Golden
Washington State Department of Health · USCancer Research And Biostatistics · USPublic Health – Seattle & King County · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Kenneth Sherr · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Virology and Molecular Biomarkers CoreP30AI050409 · NIAID · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Carlos del Rio · 2002 to 2026
$74.0M
VENEREAL DISEASET32AI007140 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Julia Cook Dombrowski · 1985 to 2026
$19.4M
Understanding substance use and incident HIV/STI among young black MSMR01DA038196 · NIDA · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ROSENBERG, ELI SAMUEL, SULLIVAN, PATRICK SEAN · 2014 to 2018
$3.2M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050409NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007140NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA038196
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany state and local health departments now promote and support the use of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), yet monitoring use of the intervention at the population level remains challenging.

methodsWe report the results of an online survey designed to measure PrEP use among men who have sex with men (MSM) in Washington State. Data on the proportion of men with indications for PrEP based on state guidelines and levels of awareness, interest, and use of PrEP are presented for 1080 cisgender male respondents who completed the survey between January 1 and February 28, 2017. We conducted bivariate and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with current PrEP use. To examine patterns of discontinuation, we conducted Cox proportional hazards regression and fit a Kaplan-Meier curve to reported data on time on PrEP.

resultsEighty percent of respondents had heard of PrEP, 19% reported current use, and 36% of men who had never used PrEP wanted to start taking it. Among MSM for whom state guidelines recommend PrEP, 31% were taking it. In multivariable analysis, current PrEP use was associated with older age, higher education, and meeting indications for PrEP use. Our data suggest that 20% of PrEP users discontinue within 12 months, and men with lower educational attainment were more likely to discontinue.

conclusionsDespite high levels of use, there is significant unmet need for PrEP in Washington. Our experience indicates that Internet surveys are feasible and informative for monitoring PrEP use in MSM.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeInternetPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overHIV InfectionsHomosexuality, MaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedProportional Hazards ModelsSexual Partners

Identifiers

PMID30870322
PMCPMC7687921
OpenAlexW2913778833

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.