ArticleJournal of athletic training2019
The Prioritized Research Agenda for the Athletic Training Profession: A Report From the Strategic Alliance Research Agenda Task Force.
Article in Journal of athletic training, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving Athletic Trainers' Knowledge of Clinical Documentation Through Novel Educational Interventions: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of athletic training · 2024Trial
- Movement Clearing Screens for Military Service Member Musculoskeletal Injury Risk Identification.Journal of athletic training · 2025Article
- A Look to the Future, but First a Look Back at Our Past.Journal of athletic training · 2025Article
- Organizational Expectations Regarding Documentation Practices in Athletic Training.Journal of athletic training · 2024Article
- Investigating the research capacity and productivity of Canadian sports chiropractors.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2023Article
- Pac-12 Health Analytics Program: An Innovative Approach to Health Care Operations, Data Analytics, and Clinical Research in Intercollegiate Athletics.Journal of athletic training · 2023Article
- Identifying sports chiropractic global research priorities: an international Delphi study of sports chiropractors.BMJ open sport & exercise medicine · 2023Article
- Identifying and prioritizing research to inform a research agenda for Canadian chiropractors working in sport - the Canadian sports chiropractic perspective.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2022Article
- Collegiate Athletic Trainers' Experiences Implementing Return-to-Sport Policies and Procedures During COVID-19: A Qualitative Research Study.Journal of athletic training · 2022Article
- Evidence for Economic Evaluations of Athletic Trainer Services.Journal of athletic training · 2022Review
- Psychological Ownership in Athletic Training.Journal of athletic training · 2022Article
- Prioritizing the Vitality of the Athletic Training Profession.Journal of athletic training · 2022Article
- Using Social Media to Engage Knowledge Users in Health Research Priority Setting: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Core Competency-Related Professional Behaviors During Patient Encounters: A Report From the Association for Athletic Training Education Research Network.Journal of athletic training · 2022Article
- Collegiate Student-Athletes' Perceptions of Patient-Centered Care Delivered by Athletic Trainers.Journal of athletic training · 2021Article
- Patient Care Documentation in the Secondary School Setting: Unique Challenges and Needs.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
- Aspects of Technology That Influence Athletic Trainers' Current Patient Care Documentation Strategies in the Secondary School.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
- Commentary on Point-of-Care Clinical Trials in Sports Medicine Research: Identifying Effective Treatment Interventions Through Real-World Evidence.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
- Research at the Point of Care: Using Electronic Medical Record Systems to Generate Clinically Meaningful Evidence.Journal of athletic training · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextAthletic trainers (ATs) must be equipped with evidence to inform their clinical practice. A systematic, inclusive, and continuous process for exploring research priorities is vital to the success of ATs and, more importantly, their patients' positive outcomes.
objectiveTo identify research priorities and unify research with clinical practice to improve patient care and advance the profession.
designMixed-methods study.
settingFocus groups and a Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER
participantsA total of 87 ATs (43 men [49.4%], 44 women [50.6%]; age = 40 ± 11 years; experience = 18 ± 11 years) participated in focus groups. Of the 49 332 e-mails sent, 580 were undeliverable, 5131 ATs started the survey (access rate = 10.5%), and 4514 agreed to participate (response rate = 9.3%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Our study consisted of 6 focus-group sessions, a content-expert review, and a Web-based survey. Themes from the focus groups were used to develop the research priorities and survey instrument. We used the 25-item validated survey to determine whether the research priorities and findings of the focus groups were generalizable. Endorsement of research priorities and recommendations was achieved when respondents indicated they agreed or strongly agreed.
resultsRespondents endorsed 5 research priorities: health care competency (n = 4438/4493, 98.8%), vitality of the profession (n = 4319/4455, 96.9%), health professions education (n = 3966/4419, 89.8%), health care economics (n = 4246/4425, 96.0%), and health information technology (n = 3893/4438, 87.7%). We also made the following recommendations: (1) develop funding initiatives that align with the agenda, (2) develop postdoctoral fellowships focused on clinical research, (3) facilitate collaborative relationships between clinicians and researchers, and (4) make research evidence more readily available and more applicable.
conclusionsUsing a systematic and inclusive process, we developed a prioritized research agenda for the athletic training profession. The agenda was endorsed by the leaders of each Strategic Alliance organization and adopted as the Athletic Training Research Agenda.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.