Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30869918›Full record

ArticlePsychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors2019

Do misperceptions of peer drinking influence personal drinking behavior? Results from a complete social network of first-year college students.

Melissa J Cox, Angelo M DiBello, Matthew K Meisel, Miles Q Ott, Shannon R Kenney, Melissa A Clark, Nancy P Barnett

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Personalized normative feedback for hazardous drinking among college women: Differential outcomes by history of incapacitated rape.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2023
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Emotion socialization within adolescent friendships: Considering the role of friends' emotion regulation, perceptions of friends, and expectations of support.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Article
  9. The Impact of Social Norms on Diffusion Dynamics: A Simulation of E-Cigarette Use Behavior.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. I need new friends! Changes in perceived peer drinking norms and developmental outcomes across the transition to college.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Diagnostic discrimination of social network indicators in alcohol use disorder: Initial examination using high-resolution and brief assessments.Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melissa J CoxDepartment of Health Education and Promotion.ORCID 0000-0002-5684-9121
Angelo M DiBelloCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Matthew K MeiselCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Miles Q OttSmith College.
Shannon R KenneyDepartment of Psychiatry and Human Behavior.
Melissa A ClarkDepartment of Quantitative Health Sciences.
Nancy P BarnettCenter for Alcohol and Addiction Studies.
Brown University · USEast Carolina University · USSmith College · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
ALCOHOL INTERVENTION/TREATMENT OUTCOME RESEARCH TRAININGT32AA007459 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI ROBERT MIRANDA, PETER M. MONTI · 1986 to 2026
$13.3M
Reducing Hazardous Alcohol Use in Social Networks using Targeted InterventionR01AA023522 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI BARNETT, NANCY P · 2015 to 2020
$3.7M
Developmental Transitions, Social Networks, and Alcohol Use Among Non Four-Year College Emerging AdultsK01AA025994 · NIAAA · BROWN UNIVERSITY · PI MEISEL, MATTHEW K · 2017 to 2021
$902k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIAAA NIH HHS K01 AA025994NIAAA NIH HHS L30 AA026155NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023522NIAAA NIH HHS T32 AA007459
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study considered the influence of misperceptions of typical versus self-identified important peers' heavy drinking on personal heavy drinking intentions and frequency utilizing data from a complete social network of college students. The study sample included data from 1,313 students (44% male, 57% White, 15% Hispanic/Latinx) collected during the fall and spring semesters of their freshman year. Students provided perceived heavy drinking frequency for a typical student peer and up to 10 identified important peers. Personal past-month heavy drinking frequency was assessed for all participants at both time points. By comparing actual with perceived heavy drinking frequencies, measures of misperceptions of heavy drinking (accurately estimate, overestimate, underestimate) were constructed for both general and important peers. These misperceptions were then used as predictors of concurrent and prospective personal heavy drinking frequency and intentions using network autocorrelation analyses. The majority of students (84.8%) overestimated, 11.3% accurately estimated, and 3.9% underestimated heavy drinking among their general peers, whereas 42.0% accurately estimated, 36.9% overestimated, and 21.1% underestimated important peers' heavy drinking. For both referents, overestimation of peer heavy drinking was associated with more frequent heavy drinking and higher drinking intentions at both time points. Importantly, the effects of underestimating and overestimating close peers' drinking on personal alcohol use were significant after controlling for the influence of misperceptions of general peers' heavy drinking. Close peers are a critical referent group in assessments related to social norms for young adult alcohol use. Implications for prevention and intervention are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

IntentionPeer GroupSocial NetworkingSocial NormsSocial PerceptionAdolescentAlcohol Drinking in CollegeFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesStudentsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30869918
PMCPMC6483870
OpenAlexW2977952992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.