Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30869793›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2019

Potential Role of Metal Chelation to Prevent the Cardiovascular Complications of Diabetes.

Rossana Calderon Moreno, Ana Navas-Acien, Esteban Escolar, David M Nathan, Jonathan Newman, John F Schmedtje, Denisse Diaz, Gervasio A Lamas, Vivian Fonseca

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. The role of corroles in modern cancer therapy: innovation and prospects.Biometals : an international journal on the role of metal ions in biology, biochemistry, and medicine · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Role of Divalent Cations in Infections in Host-Pathogen Interaction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Exploring the Biological Effects of Anti-Diabetic Vanadium Compounds in the Liver, Heart and Brain.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Rossana Calderon MorenoColumbia University Division of Preventive Medicine and Nutrition, New York, New York.
Ana Navas-AcienColumbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York.
Esteban EscolarDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida.
David M NathanDiabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Jonathan NewmanDepartment of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York.
John F SchmedtjeRoanoke Heart Institute PLC, Roanoke, Virginia.
Denisse DiazDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida.
Gervasio A LamasDepartment of Medicine, Columbia University Division of Cardiology at Mount Sinai Medical Center, Miami Beach, Florida.
Vivian FonsecaDepartment of Medicine, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Mount Sinai Medical Center · USColumbia University · USHarvard University · USNew York University · USProfessional Education and Research Institute · USTulane University · US

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI Peter Todd Katzmarzyk · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextFor decades, there has been epidemiologic evidence linking chronic toxic metal exposure with cardiovascular disease, suggesting a therapeutic role for metal chelation. Given the lack of compelling scientific evidence, however, the indications for metal chelation were never clearly defined. To determine the safety and efficacy of chelation therapy, the National Institutes of Health funded the Trial to Assess Chelation Therapy (TACT). TACT was the first double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to demonstrate an improvement in cardiovascular outcomes with edetate disodium therapy in patients with prior myocardial infarction. The therapeutic benefit was striking among the prespecified subgroup of patients with diabetes.

designWe review the published literature focusing on the atherogenic nature of diabetes, as well as available evidence from clinical trials, complete and in progress, of metal chelation with edetate disodium therapy in patients with diabetes.

resultsThe TACT results support the concept that ubiquitous toxic metals such as lead and cadmium may be modifiable risk factors for cardiovascular disease, particularly in patients with diabetes.

conclusionsThe purpose of this review is to discuss the potential mechanisms unifying the pathogenesis of atherogenic factors in diabetes with toxic metal exposure, and the potential role of metal chelation.

Indexed as

AntioxidantsArsenicAscorbic AcidAtherosclerosisCadmiumCalcium Chelating AgentsCardiovascular DiseasesChelating AgentsChelation TherapyCopperDiabetes ComplicationsDiabetes MellitusEdetic AcidGlycation End Products, AdvancedHospitalizationHumansAntioxidantsArsenicAscorbic AcidCadmiumCalcium Chelating AgentsChelating AgentsCopperEdetic AcidGlycation End Products, AdvancedIronLeadMercury

Identifiers

PMID30869793
PMCPMC9136707
OpenAlexW2922112322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.