Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30869042›Full record

ReviewEpidemiology and infection2019

Syndromic surveillance: two decades experience of sustainable systems - its people not just data!

Gillian E Smith, Alex J Elliot, Iain Lake, Obaghe Edeghere, Roger Morbey, Mike Catchpole, David L Heymann, Jeremy Hawker, Sue Ibbotson, Brian McCloskey and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Digital health for climate change mitigation and response: a scoping review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gillian E SmithReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,Field Service, National Infection Service,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4257-0568
Alex J ElliotReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,Field Service, National Infection Service,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-6414-3065
Iain LakeHealth Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response,National Institute for Health Research,London,UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4407-5357
Obaghe EdeghereReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,Field Service, National Infection Service,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4275-6338
Roger MorbeyReal-time Syndromic Surveillance Team,Field Service, National Infection Service,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8543-477X
Mike CatchpoleEuropean Centre for Disease Control,Stockholm,Sweden.
David L HeymannLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,London,UK.
Jeremy HawkerField Epidemiology West Midlands, Field Service,National Infection Service,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.
Sue IbbotsonWest Midlands Centre,Public Health England,Birmingham,UK.
Brian McCloskeyGlobal Health,Public Health England,London,UK.
Richard PebodyRespiratory Diseases Department,National Infection Service,Public Health England,London,UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9069-2885
Public Health England Real-time Syndromic Surveillance Team

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Syndromic surveillance is a form of surveillance that generates information for public health action by collecting, analysing and interpreting routine health-related data on symptoms and clinical signs reported by patients and clinicians rather than being based on microbiologically or clinically confirmed cases. In England, a suite of national real-time syndromic surveillance systems (SSS) have been developed over the last 20 years, utilising data from a variety of health care settings (a telehealth triage system, general practice and emergency departments). The real-time systems in England have been used for early detection (e.g. seasonal influenza), for situational awareness (e.g. describing the size and demographics of the impact of a heatwave) and for reassurance of lack of impact on population health of mass gatherings (e.g. the London 2012 Olympic and Paralympic Games).We highlight the lessons learnt from running SSS, for nearly two decades, and propose questions and issues still to be addressed. We feel that syndromic surveillance is an example of the use of 'big data', but contend that the focus for sustainable and useful systems should be on the added value of such systems and the importance of people working together to maximise the value for the public health of syndromic surveillance services.

Indexed as

Sentinel SurveillanceEnglandHumansPublic Health SurveillancePublic healthreal-timesyndromic surveillance

Identifiers

PMID30869042
PMCPMC6518508

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.