Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30869036›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

Seroprevalence of HCV, HBV and HIV in two inner-city London emergency departments.

L Cieply, R Simmons, S Ijaz, E Kara, A Rodger, W Rosenberg, A McGuinness, J L Mbisa, J Ledesma, N Ohemeng-Kumi and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergency Department Opt-Out Testing for Hepatitis B: A Two-Year UK Multicentre Evaluation of Outcomes Across Seven Sites.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Pilot postal birth cohort hepatitis C virus screening in UK primary care: HepCAPP study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeted HIV screening in the emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

L CieplyImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
R SimmonsImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8156-0146
S IjazThe National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London,London,UK.
E KaraImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
A RodgerThe Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, The Royal Free Hospital,London,UK.
W RosenbergThe National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London,London,UK.
A McGuinnessUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University College London Hospital,London,UK.
J L MbisaAntiviral Unit, Virus Reference Department,National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
J LedesmaThe National Institute for Health Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Blood Borne and Sexually Transmitted Infections at University College London,London,UK.
N Ohemeng-KumiBlood Borne Virus Unit, Virus Reference Department,National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
S DicksBlood Borne Virus Unit, Virus Reference Department,National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
H PottsInstitute of Health Informatics, University College London,London,UK.
S LattimoreImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
S MandalImmunisation, Hepatitis and Blood Safety Department,Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance & Control (CIDSC), National Infection Service, Public Health England,London,UK.
Public Health England · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GBRoyal Free London NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryIn this paper we build on work investigating the feasibility of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) testing in emergency departments (EDs), estimating the prevalence of hepatitis B, C and HIV infections among persons attending two inner-London EDs, identifying factors associated with testing positive in an ED. We also undertook molecular characterisation to look at the diversity of the viruses circulating in these individuals, and the presence of clinically significant mutations which impact on treatment and control.Blood-borne virus (BBV) testing in non-traditional settings is feasible, with emergency departments (ED) potentially effective at reaching vulnerable and underserved populations. We investigated the feasibility of BBV testing within two inner-London EDs. Residual samples from biochemistry for adults (⩾18 years) attending The Royal Free London Hospital (RFLH) or the University College London Hospital (UCLH) ED between January and June 2015 were tested for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Ag/Ab, anti-hepatitis C (HCV) and HBsAg. PCR and sequence analysis were conducted on reactive samples. Sero-prevalence among persons attending RFH and UCLH with residual samples (1287 and 1546), respectively, were 1.1% and 1.0% for HBsAg, 1.6% and 2.3% for anti-HCV, 0.9% and 1.6% for HCV RNA, and 1.3% and 2.2% for HIV. For RFH, HBsAg positivity was more likely among persons of black vs. white ethnicity (odds ratio 9.08; 95% confidence interval 2.72-30), with anti-HCV positivity less likely among females (0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.50). For UCLH, HBsAg positivity was more likely among non-white ethnicity (13.34, 95% CI 2.20-80.86 (Asian); 8.03, 95% CI 1.12-57.61 (black); and 8.11, 95% CI 1.13-58.18 (other/mixed)). Anti-HCV positivity was more likely among 36-55 year olds vs. ⩾56 years (7.69, 95% CI 2.24-26.41), and less likely among females (0.24, 95% CI 0.09-0.65). Persons positive for HIV-markers were more likely to be of black vs. white ethnicity (4.51, 95% CI 1.63-12.45), and less likely to have one ED attendance (0.39, 95% CI 0.17-0.88), or female (0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.42). These results indicate that BBV-testing in EDs is feasible, providing a basis for further studies to explore provider and patient acceptability, referral into care and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleGenotypeHepacivirusHepatitis BHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis B virusHepatitis CHepatitis C AntibodiesHIVHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensHepatitis B Surface AntigensHepatitis C AntibodiesHIV AntibodiesHIV AntigensAnonymous testingemergency departmenthepatitis Bhepatitis CHIV

Identifiers

PMID30869036
PMCPMC6518517
OpenAlexW2922224107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.