Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30869032›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and infection2019

A hospital qPCR-based survey of 10 gastrointestinal parasites in routine diagnostic screening, Marseille, France.

E Menu, C Mary, I Toga, D Raoult, S Ranque, F Bittar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and infection, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Occurrence and subtyping of the intestinal protozoanFood and waterborne parasitology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the Performance of the NovodiagPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Rare Occurrence ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  9. The NovodiagParasite (Paris, France) · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Natural Infection withmSphere · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E MenuAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille,France.
C MaryAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille, France.
I TogaAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille, France.
D RaoultAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille,France.
S RanqueAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, VITROME, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille, France.
F BittarAix Marseille University, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU-Méditerranée Infection,Marseille,France.ORCID 0000-0003-4052-344X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a scarcity of recent epidemiological data on intestinal parasitic infections in France. We conducted a prospective study aimed at estimating the prevalence of 10 enteric parasites in Marseille, France, using real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnosis. A total of 643 faeces from 488 patients referred to the Parasitology-Mycology Laboratory of the University Hospital of Marseille over a 6 months period were included. DNA was extracted using a semi-automated method. Parasites of interest were detected using singleplex quantitative PCRs (qPCRs). For positive samples, the Blastocystis subtype was determined by sequence analysis. During the study, the overall prevalence of enteric parasites was 17%. Blastocystis sp. was the most frequent species (10.5%), followed by Dientamoeba fragilis (2.3%) and Giardia intestinalis (2.3%). The prevalence of other parasites was <1% each. The ST3 Blastocystis subtype was predominant (43.6%) and the other subtypes identified were ST1, ST2, ST4 and ST6. This is the first time that a qPCR-based diagnosis has been used to survey the prevalence of 10 enteric parasites in a French University Hospital. This study confirms that fast, specific, sensitive and simultaneous detection in a single stool sample by qPCR clearly outperforms conventional microscopy-based diagnosis. Furthermore, qPCR is particularly well suited to surveying gastroenteritis agents.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildChild, PreschoolFecesFemaleFranceHumansInfantIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceProspective StudiesEnteric parasitesFrancemicrosporidiaprotozoaqPCR

Identifiers

PMID30869032
PMCPMC6518462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.