Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30868767›Full record

ArticleMolecular genetics & genomic medicine2019

MTHFR C677T polymorphism analysis: A simple, effective restriction enzyme-based method improving previous protocols.

Francesca Antonaros, Giulia Olivucci, Elena Cicchini, Giuseppe Ramacieri, Maria Chiara Pelleri, Lorenza Vitale, Pierluigi Strippoli, Chiara Locatelli, Guido Cocchi, Allison Piovesan and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular genetics & genomic medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genotype Combinations and Genetic Risk Score Analyses ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Study of theDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  3. The association ofArchives animal breeding · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Francesca AntonarosUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giulia OlivucciUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Elena CicchiniUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Giuseppe RamacieriUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Maria Chiara PelleriUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Lorenza VitaleUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi StrippoliUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara LocatelliNeonatology Unit, St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, Bologna, Italy.
Guido CocchiNeonatology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), St. Orsola-Malpighi Polyclinic, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Allison PiovesanUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7038-5557
Maria CaracausiUnit of Histology, Embryology and Applied Biology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine (DIMES), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background5,10-Methylentetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism is one of the most studied genetic variations in the human genome. Polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) is one of the most used techniques to characterize the point mutations in genomic sequences because of its suitability and low cost. The most widely used method for the MTHFR C677T polymorphism characterization was developed by Frosst et al. (1995) but appears to have some technical limitations. The aim of this study was to propose a novel PCR-RFLP method for the detection of this polymorphism.

methodsIn order to retrieve all published articles possibly describing any PCR-RFLP methods useful to analyze MTHFR C677T polymorphism, we performed systematic queries on PubMed, using a combination of Boolean operators (AND/OR) and MeSH terms. Amplify software was used in order to design a new primer pair following the optimal standard criteria. Primer-BLAST software was used to check primer pair's biological specificity.

resultsThe analysis of previous literature showed that PCR-RFLP method remains the most used technique. None of the 108 primer pairs described was ideal with regard to main accepted primer pair biochemical technical parameters. The new primer pair amplifies a DNA-fragment of 513 base pair (bp) that, in the presence of the polymorphism, is cut by Hinf I enzyme in two pieces of 146 bp and 367 bp and clearly visible on 2% agarose gel. The level of expertise and the materials required are minimal and the protocol takes one day to carry out.

conclusionOur original PCR-RFLP strategy, specifically designed to make the analysis optimal with respect to PCR primers and gel analysis, fits the ideal criteria compared to the widely used strategy by Frosst et al (1995) as well as any other PCR-RFLP strategies proposed for MTHFR C677T polymorphism genotyping to date.

Indexed as

Polymorphism, Single NucleotideAmplified Fragment Length Polymorphism AnalysisGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMethylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)Methylenetetrahydrofolate Reductase (NADPH2)MTHFR protein, humanMTHFR C677Tnew primer pairPCR-RFLPrisk factorsingle nucleotide polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID30868767
PMCPMC6503068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.