Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30868734›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2019

A pilot feasibility randomised clinical trial comparing dialkylcarbamoylchloride-coated dressings versus standard care for the primary prevention of surgical site infection.

Joshua P Totty, Louise H Hitchman, Paris L Cai, Amy E Harwood, Tom Wallace, Dan Carradice, George E Smith, Ian C Chetter

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Joshua P TottyAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-1414
Louise H HitchmanAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9681-6749
Paris L CaiAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Amy E HarwoodAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Tom WallaceAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Dan CarradiceAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
George E SmithAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.
Ian C ChetterAcademic Vascular Surgical Unit, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK.

Funding

Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (VERN)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A surgical site infection (SSI) may occur in up to 30% of procedures and results in significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to assess the feasibility of conducting a randomised controlled trial (RCT) examining the use of dialkylcarbamoylchloride (DACC)-impregnated dressings, which bind bacteria at the wound bed, in the prevention of SSI in primarily closed incisional wounds. This pilot RCT recruited patients undergoing clean or clean-contaminated vascular surgery. Participants were randomised intraoperatively on a 1:1 basis to either a DACC-coated dressing or a control dressing. Outcomes were divided into feasibility and clinical outcomes. The primary clinical outcome was SSI at 30 days (assessed using Centers for Disease Control criteria and Additional treatment, Serous discharge, Erythema, Purulent exudate, Separation of the deep tissues, Isolation of bacteria and duration of inpatient Stay scoring methods). This study recruited 144 patients in 12 months at a median rate of 10 per month. Eligibility was 73% and recruitment 60%. At 30 days, there was a 36.9% relative risk reduction in the DACC-coated arm (16.22% versus 25.71%, odds ratio 0.559, P = 0.161). The number needed to treat was 11 patients. A large-scale RCT is both achievable and desirable given the relative risk reduction shown in this study. Further work is needed to improve the study protocol and involve more centres in a full-scale RCT.

Indexed as

BandagesAdultAgedAnti-Infective AgentsCarbamatesFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOdds RatioPilot ProjectsPrimary PreventionSurgical Wound InfectionVascular Surgical ProceduresWound HealingAnti-Infective AgentsCarbamatesdialkycarbamoylchlorideRCTsurgical site infectionwound dressings

Identifiers

PMID30868734
PMCPMC6850133

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.