ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2019
Clinical significance of pleural effusions and association with outcome in patients hospitalized with a first episode of acute pericarditis.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Immunomodulating Therapies in Acute Myocarditis and Recurrent/Acute Pericarditis.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Pooled it
- Old and New Biomarkers in Idiopathic Recurrent Acute Pericarditis (IRAP): Prognosis and Outcomes.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Cardiac related pleural effusions: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- Article
- Percutaneous pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion: predictors of mortality and outcomes.Internal and emergency medicine · 2021Observational
- Cardiac tamponade and massive pleural effusion in a young COVID-19-positive adult.BMJ case reports · 2021Article
- Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Pericarditis: Definitions and New Treatments.Current cardiology reports · 2021Review
- Pericardial effusion in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: A cross-sectional study from Asia and review of the literature.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacologyReview
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The clinical significance of pleural effusions (PLEs) in the setting of acute pericarditis remains poorly investigated. We sought to identify predictive factors for PLEs and their association with the short- and long-term prognosis of patients with acute pericarditis. We enrolled 177 patients hospitalized with a first episode of acute pericarditis. In all cases an extensive clinical, biochemical, and diagnostic work-up to detect PLEs and establish etiological diagnosis was performed. All patients included were prospectively followed for a maximum of 18 months (median 12, range 1-18) and complications were recorded. PLEs were detected in n = 94 cases (53.1% of the cohort; bilateral 53.2%, left-sided 28.7%, right-sided 18.1%) and were strongly associated with c-reactive protein (CRP) levels at admission (rho = 0.328, p < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, independent predictors for PLEs were female gender (OR = 2.46, 95% CI 1.03-5.83), age (per 1-year increment OR = 1.030, 95% CI 1.005-1.056), CRP levels (per 1 mg/L increment OR = 1.012, 95% CI 1.006-1.019) and size of pericardial effusion (per 1 cm increment, OR = 1.899, 95% CI 1.228-2.935). Bilateral PLEs were associated with increased risk for in-hospital cardiac tamponade (OR = 7.52, 95% CI 2.16-26.21). There was no association of PLEs with new onset atrial fibrillation or pericarditis recurrence during long-term follow-up (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.