ArticleLa Radiologia medica2019
Magnetic resonance imaging of the sacroiliac joints in SpA: with or without intravenous contrast media? A preliminary report.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Imaging findings in patients with axial spondyloarthritis presenting with recurrent fever attacks: data from the international AIDA network spondyloarthritis registry.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging: state of the art and applications in whole-body imaging.Japanese journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Imaging update in spondyloarthropathy.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021Article
- Diagnostic performance of DIXON sequences on low-field scanner for the evaluation of knee joint pathology.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2021Article
- T2-mapping MRI evaluation of patellofemoral cartilage in patients submitted to intra-articular platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections.La Radiologia medica · 2021Article
- Anterior chest wall non-traumatic diseases: a road map for the radiologist.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2020Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectActive sacroiliitis based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) without intravenous (I.V.) contrast material injection is considered sufficient for the diagnosis of spondyloarthritis (SpA), according to the Assessment of SpondyloArthritis International Society (ASAS) criteria. This work shows the added value of administering I.V. contrast material when evaluating the response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists therapy, on the extension of bone marrow oedema (BMO) and pathological enhancement (osteitis/synovitis) in the sacroiliac joints (SIJs) on MRI. MATERIALS AND
methodsForty-three patients (25 females and 18 males, mean age of 54 ± 16.60 years, range 22-75 years) with a clinical diagnosis of SpA and active sacroiliitis at MRI with I.V. contrast material, were considered for a follow-up MRI after 6 months of TNF antagonists therapy. Disease activity was monitored by a Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics, Student's t test and Cohen's kappa were used. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsThirty-eight patients were finally included in the study; 36 of them showed an improvement on clinical assessment after therapy. Score's difference (improvement) after treatment was calculated in the MRI sequences both with and without contrast agent (respectively, mean value and range 3.18, 0-12 with contrast and 1.63, 0-7 without contrast). This improvement was statistically significant in each group (P value of 7.097e-08 with contrast and 6.741e-06 without contrast), and there was a significant difference between the two group too (P-value of 8.598e-07). Cohen's kappa for dichotomous variables showed a better agreement between the post-contrast MRI findings and BASDAI (K = 0.53, agreement = 92.11%, P = 0.0001) than MRI without contrast and BASDAI (K = 0.11, agreement = 57.89%, P = 0.06).
conclusionsThe evaluation of enhancement is a reliable tool for the assessment of the response to therapy in SIJs involvement in SpA, better than BMO; hence, it should be advised in the MRI of these patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
30868439What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.