ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2019
Adherence to Treatment and Follow-Up in Patients with Severe Chemical Eye Burns.
Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Determinants of loss to follow-up after eye-related emergency visits: A race-stratified analysis at a level I trauma center.PloS one · 2026Article
- Demographic profile and clinical characteristics of patients presenting with acute ocular burns.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Epidemiological features and management of eye burn patients in Wuxi, China.BMJ open ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Ophthalmic Emergency Department Visits: Factors Associated With Loss to Follow-up.American journal of ophthalmology · 2021Article
- Assault-related severe ocular chemical injury at a London ophthalmic referral hospital: a 3-year retrospective observational study.BMJ open · 2020Observational
- Hypothermically Stored Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Alginate Bandages Facilitate Use of Paracrine Molecules for Corneal Wound Healing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Clinical characteristics of patients hospitalized for ocular chemical injuries in Shanghai from 2012 to 2017.International ophthalmology · 2020Article
- An update on chemical eye burns.Eye (London, England) · 2019Review
- Epidemiology and follow-up adherence of ophthalmic emergencies: A 10-year study at a tertiary medical center in Taiwan.Taiwan journal of ophthalmologyArticle
- A Retrospective Analysis of Visit Durations and Referral Attendance for Pediatric Ocular Conditions Seen in Emergency and Urgent Care Settings.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionTo investigate the demographics, acute management and compliance rates of severe chemical eye burn cases that presented to the largest eye hospital in the United Kingdom (UK).
methodsAll patients presenting to the Moorfields Eye Hospital emergency department are registered on the electronic patient administration system (PAS). A search of the PAS for patients assigned a preset diagnosis of 'chemical injury' was performed for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2016. The results of the PAS search and handwritten clerking notes were reviewed. Eyes that were found to have ≥ 33% limbal ischaemia or limbal staining, or corneal haze that obscured the details of the iris, were recorded as having severe chemical injuries.
results55 patients had mild chemical eye burns, and 11 eyes of 10 patients had severe burns. Average patient age was 37 years (SD 22 years) and 22 years (SD 10 years) for mild and severe chemical injuries, respectively. 53% of the mild injuries and 90% of the severe injuries were in males. 7 (70%) of the 10 severe injuries were assault-related. In the severe chemical injuries group, first presentation to the emergency department was 24 h or more postinjury in 50% of the patients, 33% stopped ascorbate and citrate drops (ocular pain), 40% stopped attending clinical follow-up sessions, and 45% of the eyes had a final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/18 or worse.
conclusionA significant proportion of the severe ocular chemical burns were assault-related. Delayed presentation and poor treatment adherence and follow-up attendance rates are significant challenges in patients with severe chemical burns. Patient education and public health awareness are important strategies. These findings also raise the question of whether these patients, who are mostly young males, should be admitted to improve treatment adherence rates and visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.