Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30868417›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology and therapy2019

Adherence to Treatment and Follow-Up in Patients with Severe Chemical Eye Burns.

Mukhtar Bizrah, Ammar Yusuf, Sajjad Ahmad

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology and therapy, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. An update on chemical eye burns.Eye (London, England) · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mukhtar BizrahImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Western Eye Hospital, London, UK. m.bizrah@nhs.net.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7149-1017
Ammar YusufUCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
Sajjad AhmadMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo investigate the demographics, acute management and compliance rates of severe chemical eye burn cases that presented to the largest eye hospital in the United Kingdom (UK).

methodsAll patients presenting to the Moorfields Eye Hospital emergency department are registered on the electronic patient administration system (PAS). A search of the PAS for patients assigned a preset diagnosis of 'chemical injury' was performed for the period from 1 January to 31 March 2016. The results of the PAS search and handwritten clerking notes were reviewed. Eyes that were found to have ≥ 33% limbal ischaemia or limbal staining, or corneal haze that obscured the details of the iris, were recorded as having severe chemical injuries.

results55 patients had mild chemical eye burns, and 11 eyes of 10 patients had severe burns. Average patient age was 37 years (SD 22 years) and 22 years (SD 10 years) for mild and severe chemical injuries, respectively. 53% of the mild injuries and 90% of the severe injuries were in males. 7 (70%) of the 10 severe injuries were assault-related. In the severe chemical injuries group, first presentation to the emergency department was 24 h or more postinjury in 50% of the patients, 33% stopped ascorbate and citrate drops (ocular pain), 40% stopped attending clinical follow-up sessions, and 45% of the eyes had a final best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 6/18 or worse.

conclusionA significant proportion of the severe ocular chemical burns were assault-related. Delayed presentation and poor treatment adherence and follow-up attendance rates are significant challenges in patients with severe chemical burns. Patient education and public health awareness are important strategies. These findings also raise the question of whether these patients, who are mostly young males, should be admitted to improve treatment adherence rates and visual outcome.

Indexed as

AdherenceAlkali burnAscorbic acidChemical burnsChemical injuriesDua et al. classificationLimbal ischemiaOcular burnsRoper-Hall

Identifiers

PMID30868417
PMCPMC6514011
OpenAlexW2920923165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.