Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30868226›Full record

ArticleJournal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology2019

Flower scent of Ceropegia stenantha: electrophysiological activity and synthesis of novel components.

Annemarie Heiduk, Jean-Paul Haenni, Ulrich Meve, Stefan Schulz, Stefan Dötterl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Diverse floral scents in MalagasyFrontiers in plant science · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Fly Pollination of Kettle Trap Flowers ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  6. Pitfall Flower Development and Organ Identity ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annemarie HeidukDepartment of Biosciences, Plant Ecology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. annemarie.heiduk@gmx.net.ORCID 0000-0002-7857-6646
Jean-Paul HaenniNatural History Museum Neuchâtel, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Ulrich MeveDepartment of Plant Systematics, University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany.
Stefan SchulzInstitute of Organic Chemistry, Technische Universität Braunschweig, Brunswick, Germany.
Stefan DötterlDepartment of Biosciences, Plant Ecology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunnerstr. 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In specialized pollination systems, floral scents are crucial for flower-pollinator communication, but key volatiles that attract pollinators are unknown for most systems. Deceptive Ceropegia trap flowers are famous for their elaborate mechanisms to trap flies. Recent studies revealed species-specific floral chemistry suggesting highly specialized mimicry strategies. However, volatiles involved in fly attraction were until now identified in C. dolichophylla and C. sandersonii, only. We here present data on C. stenantha for which flower scent and pollinators were recently described, but volatiles involved in flower-fly communication stayed unknown. We performed electrophysiological measurements with scatopsid fly pollinators (Coboldia fuscipes) and identified 12 out of 13 biologically active floral components. Among these volatiles some were never described from any organism but C. stenantha. We synthesized these components, tested them on antennae of male and female flies, and confirmed their biological activity. Overall, our data show that half of the volatiles emitted from C. stenantha flowers are perceived by male and female fly pollinators and are potentially important for flower-fly communication in this pollination system. Further studies are needed to clarify the role of the electrophysiologically active components in the life of scatopsid fly pollinators, and to fully understand the pollination strategy of C. stenantha.

Indexed as

DipteraPollinationAnimalsBehavior, AnimalFemaleFlowersMaleOdorantsSarraceniaceaeVolatile Organic CompoundsVolatile Organic Compounds3-Acetyloxy-1-phenylbutan-2-one3-Acetyloxy-4-phenylbutan-2-oneElectrophysiologyFlower scentScatopsidae

Identifiers

PMID30868226
PMCPMC6579769

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.