Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30868063›Full record

ArticleFEBS open bio2019

Rapid bacterial identification by direct PCR amplification of 16S rRNA genes using the MinION™ nanopore sequencer.

Shinichi Kai, Yoshiyuki Matsuo, So Nakagawa, Kirill Kryukov, Shino Matsukawa, Hiromasa Tanaka, Teppei Iwai, Tadashi Imanishi, Kiichi Hirota

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEBS open bio, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Advances in methods for rapid detection of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Formulation and Quality Assessment of a FunctionalInternational journal of food science · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Critical evaluation of strategies to achieve direct real-time PCR detection of swine pathogens in oral fluids.Journal of veterinary diagnostic investigation : official publication of the American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians, Inc · 2023
    Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shinichi KaiDepartment of Anesthesia Kyoto University Hospital Japan.
Yoshiyuki MatsuoDepartment of Human Stress Response Science Institute of Biomedical Science Kansai Medical University Hirakata Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3183-4871
So NakagawaDepartment of Molecular Life Science Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.
Kirill KryukovDepartment of Molecular Life Science Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.
Shino MatsukawaDepartment of Anesthesia Kyoto University Hospital Japan.
Hiromasa TanakaDepartment of Human Stress Response Science Institute of Biomedical Science Kansai Medical University Hirakata Japan.
Teppei IwaiDepartment of Human Stress Response Science Institute of Biomedical Science Kansai Medical University Hirakata Japan.
Tadashi ImanishiDepartment of Molecular Life Science Tokai University School of Medicine Isehara Japan.
Kiichi HirotaDepartment of Human Stress Response Science Institute of Biomedical Science Kansai Medical University Hirakata Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-1110-0827

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rapid identification of bacterial pathogens is crucial for appropriate and adequate antibiotic treatment, which significantly improves patient outcomes. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing has proven to be a powerful strategy for diagnosing bacterial infections. We have recently established a sequencing method and bioinformatics pipeline for 16S rRNA gene analysis utilizing the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION™ sequencer. In combination with our taxonomy annotation analysis pipeline, the system enabled the molecular detection of bacterial DNA in a reasonable time frame for diagnostic purposes. However, purification of bacterial DNA from specimens remains a rate-limiting step in the workflow. To further accelerate the process of sample preparation, we adopted a direct PCR strategy that amplifies 16S rRNA genes from bacterial cell suspensions without DNA purification. Our results indicate that differences in cell wall morphology significantly affect direct PCR efficiency and sequencing data. Notably, mechanical cell disruption preceding direct PCR was indispensable for obtaining an accurate representation of the specimen bacterial composition. Furthermore, 16S rRNA gene analysis of mock polymicrobial samples indicated that primer sequence optimization is required to avoid preferential detection of particular taxa and to cover a broad range of bacterial species. This study establishes a relatively simple workflow for rapid bacterial identification via MinION™ sequencing, which reduces the turnaround time from sample to result, and provides a reliable method that may be applicable to clinical settings.

Indexed as

NanoporesPolymerase Chain ReactionSequence Analysis, RNAEscherichia coliHumansRNA, Ribosomal, 16SStaphylococcus aureusRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNAbacterial identificationdirect PCRMinIONnanopore sequencer

Identifiers

PMID30868063
PMCPMC6396348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.