ArticleCureus2019
Postoperative Management of Anterior Visual Pathway Cavernoma, a Unique Perspective: Case Report.
Article in Cureus, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optochiasmatic Cavernomas: Updated systematic review and proposal of a novel classification with surgical approaches.Neurosurgical review · 2024Pooled it
- Pediatric chiasmatic cavernoma hemorrhage: a case report and review of the literature.BMC pediatrics · 2026Review
- Diagnosis and treatment status of suprasellar optic pathway cavernous malformations.The Journal of international medical research · 2023Review
- An isolated cavernous malformation of the sixth cranial nerve: A case report and review of literature.Surgical neurology international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cavernous malformations (CMs) are low-flow vascular lesions with an incidence of 0.1% to 0.7% in the general population. Less than 1% are found in the anterior visual pathway. The most common presenting symptoms are visual disturbances due to hemorrhage and the current standard of treatment is gross total resection. The authors report a case of a 42-year-old male with visual disturbance and findings on T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) suggesting CM of the right optic nerve and right optic chiasm. The patient underwent right pterional craniotomy for gross total resection of the lesion. One year postoperatively, the patient demonstrated improvement in visual deficits with no signs of recurrence on MRI. Thirty-two months postresection, MRI showed a small slightly lobulated area of T1 hyperintense material within the postoperative cavity along the right aspect of the optic chiasm. MRI at 39 months postresection showed previously seen small amounts of T1 hyperintensity in the central and right aspect of the optic chiasm, with significantly decreased conspicuity. These findings suggest a trace amount of recurrence in the 32-month postoperative imaging despite overall stable visual field testing. There is a paucity of literature concerning the retreatment of resected CM in the anterior visual pathway. The authors suggest serial imaging as an integral component of CM management. Although repeated visual field testing and clinical follow-up are important aspects of CM management, they are no substitute for the gold standard of MRI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.