Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867995›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2019

An assessment for health education and health promotion in chronic disease demonstration districts: a comparative study from Hunan Province, China.

Qiaohua Xu, Biyun Chen, Donghui Jin, Li Yin, Yuelong Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qiaohua XuDepartment of Chronic Diseases Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Biyun ChenDepartment of Chronic Diseases Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Donghui JinDepartment of Chronic Diseases Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Li YinDepartment of Chronic Diseases Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Yuelong HuangDepartment of Chronic Diseases Control and Prevention, Hunan Provincial Center for Diseases Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Hunan Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCost-effective strategies of chronic disease control, integrated health education and health promotion play important roles in the programs of chronic disease demonstration districts in China. The performance of these districts can be directly assessed by their health education and promotion work. However, there have been only a few performance assessments done on these programs, most of which made without the inclusion of proper quality indicators. This study was designed to establish a framework of indicators for outcome evaluation of health education and promotion efforts in Chinese districts, and explore the factors involved in promoting these efforts.

methodsA modified two-round Delphi survey was first used to construct quality indicators on a nine-point Likert scale. With those indicators, the rank sum ratio (RSR) method was then conducted through rank conversion and parametric statistics, to assess and classify the performance of ten districts or counties randomly chosen both from demonstration and non-demonstration districts in the Hunan province.

resultsThe Delphi process produced seven themes and 25 sub-themes as quality indicators. The seven themes included organizational management, financial support, professional personnel, health education and promotion, residents' health awareness and behaviors, residents' satisfaction, and residents' health literacy. The districts were classified into four levels by RSR as follows: One demonstration district at the first-ranked level, five other demonstration districts at the second-ranked level, all non-demonstration districts at the third-ranked level. None were at the fourth-qualified level. DISCUSSION: Chronic disease demonstration districts performed better on the work of health education and health promotion than the non-demonstration districts. The work should be focused on the following measures of chronic diseases: organizational management, financial support, media-related broadcasting, technical support, community-based promotion and supportive environment, and people's enhanced awareness and health literacy.

Indexed as

AssessmentChronic diseaseDelphiHealth education and health promotionRSR

Identifiers

PMID30867995
PMCPMC6409084
OpenAlexW2919735169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.