Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867935›Full record

ArticleMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2019

Does the safe childbirth checklist (SCC) program save newborn lives? Evidence from a realistic quasi-experimental study, Rajasthan, India.

Beena Varghese, Andrew Copas, Shwetanjali Kumari, Souvik Bandyopadhyay, Jigyasa Sharma, Somen Saha, Vikas Yadav, Somesh Kumar

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01994304 (Assessment and Evaluation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist --Phase II Rajasthan, India), which is not on this map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01994304 nacompletednot on this map

Assessment and Evaluation of the Safe Childbirth Checklist --Phase II Rajasthan, India

TypeinterventionalSponsorPublic Health Foundation of IndiaRan2012 to 2016Enrolled200,000ConditionsIntrapartum MortalityArmsSCC
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of the WHO safe childbirth checklist on birth attendant behavior and maternal-newborn outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Beena Varghese1Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 India.ORCID 0000-0002-4329-2811
Andrew Copas2University College, London, UK.
Shwetanjali KumariIndependent Public health Consultant (Previously with PHFI), Banaglore, India.
Souvik Bandyopadhyay1Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 India.
Jigyasa Sharma4Harvard T. H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, USA.
Somen Saha1Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No 47, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana 122002 India.
Vikas YadavJhpeigo, Okhla Industrial Estate Phase 3 Rd, New Delhi, Delhi, 110020 India.
Somesh KumarJhpeigo, Okhla Industrial Estate Phase 3 Rd, New Delhi, Delhi, 110020 India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe WHO Safe Childbirth Checklist (SCC) is a facility-based reminder tool focusing on essential care to improve quality of intrapartum care. We aimed to assess the impact of an intervention package using the SCC tool on facility-based stillbirths (SBs) and very early neonatal deaths (vENDs), in Rajasthan, India.

methodsWithin a quasi-experimental framework, districts were selected as intervention or comparison, matched by annual delivery load. The SCC tool was introduced at all district and sub-district level health facilities in the seven intervention districts, followed by monthly supportive supervision visits. In addition, supply of drugs and equipment were facilitated in all facilities (2013-2015). Facilities in the comparison districts provided routine care. Analysis included only the facilities with a specialized newborn care unit and information on all births was collected from facility registers. The primary outcome was the combined facility-based stillbirths and very early neonatal deaths (within 3-days after birth). We used generalized estimating equation with a Poisson regression model, with time as a linear term and adjusted for facility type in our model to estimate the effect of the intervention. [ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01994304].

results77,239 births were recorded from 19 intervention facilities and 59,800 births from 15 comparison facilities. The intervention facilities reported 1621 stillbirths and 505 vENDs compared to 1390 stillbirths and 420 vENDs from the comparison facilities (RR 0.89, CI 0.81, 0.97). This translated to 11.16% (

conclusionOur results suggest that the SCC program is an effective intervention that could potentially avert 40,000 intrapartum deaths in India annually, most of reduction coming from prevention of stillbirths.

Indexed as

Facility-based maternal and newborn interventionsMaternal and newborn careSafe childbirth checklistStillbirthsVery early neonatal mortality

Identifiers

PMID30867935
PMCPMC6397441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.