Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867901›Full record

Observational studyAntimicrobial resistance and infection control2019

The public washroom - friend or foe? An observational study of washroom cleanliness combined with microbiological investigation of hand hygiene facilities.

Lorna K P Suen, Gilman K H Siu, Yue Ping Guo, Simon K W Yeung, Kiki Y K Lo, Margaret O'Donoghue

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Antimicrobial resistance and infection control, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surveillance of Bacterial Load and Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria on Surfaces of Public Restrooms.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lorna K P Suen1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.ORCID 0000-0002-0126-6674
Gilman K H Siu2Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Yue Ping Guo1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Simon K W Yeung1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Kiki Y K Lo1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Margaret O'Donoghue1School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong, SAR China.
Hong Kong Polytechnic University · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Many people use handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms under the impression that these amenities are hygienic. However, such facilities may be potential sites for the transmission of pathogenic bacteria. This study aimed to examine the hygiene facilities provided including handwashing and hand-drying facilities in public washrooms. Total bacterial counts and species identification were determined for hand-drying facilities. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were performed. Methods: The bacterial contamination levels of 55 public washrooms ranging in category from low class communities to high end establishments, were examined. The hygienic environment and facilities of the washrooms were analysed using an electronic checklist to facilitate immediate data entry. Pre-moistened sterile swabs were used to collect samples from areas around the outlet of paper towel dispensers, air outlet of air dryers, exit door handles and paper towels in the washrooms. Total bacterial counts were performed and isolates identified using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion. Results: The high and middle-income categories washrooms generally had cleaner facilities and environment followed by those in low categories. Fifty-two bacterial species were identified from the 55 investigated washrooms. Over 97% of the pathogenic Conclusion: Our findings suggest that hand-drying facilities in public washrooms can act as reservoirs of drug-resistant bacteria. The importance of frequent cleaning and maintenance of public washrooms to promote safe hand hygiene practices for the public are emphasised.

Indexed as

Toilet FacilitiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaColony Count, MicrobialCross-Sectional StudiesEnvironmental MicrobiologyEquipment ContaminationHand DisinfectionHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsPublic FacilitiesSpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobialBacteriaEnvironmental microbiologyHand dryingHand hygieneMALDI-TOF MSMicroorganismsPublic healthToiletWashroom

Identifiers

PMID30867901
PMCPMC6396476
OpenAlexW2940433583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.