ArticleBiomicrofluidics2019
Reducing deposition of encrustation in ureteric stents by changing the stent architecture: A microfluidic-based investigation.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06815120 (Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Two Single Arm, Multicentre Unblinded First-in-human Trials Investigating a Novel Ureteric Stent to Determine the Reduction of Encrustation, Biofilm Deposition and Complications Compared to a Conventional JJ Stent
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Experimental and CFD analysis of flow impediments and encrustation in ureteral stents using in vitro urinary tract model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- iCLOTS: open-source, artificial intelligence-enabled software for analyses of blood cells in microfluidic and microscopy-based assays.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Investigating the encrustation of reinforced ureteral stents by computational flow dynamic simulations.World journal of urology · 2023Article
- Outcomes Associated with the Endourological Management of Stent Encrustation: Findings from a Literature Review on Behalf of the EAU YAU Urolithiasis Group.Current urology reports · 2023Review
- Fluid mechanical performance of ureteral stents: The role of side hole and lumen size.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2023Article
- The interplay between bacterial biofilms, encrustation, and wall shear stress in ureteral stents: a review across scales.Frontiers in urology · 2023Review
- New insights into the prevention of ureteral stents encrustation.Open medicine (Warsaw, Poland) · 2023Review
- Computational simulation of the flow dynamic field in a porous ureteric stent.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- The accumulation of particles in ureteric stents is mediated by flow dynamics: Full-scale computational and experimental modeling of the occluded and unoccluded ureter.APL bioengineering · 2022Article
- Environmental, Microbiological, and Immunological Features of Bacterial Biofilms Associated with Implanted Medical Devices.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022Review
- Review
- Laser Direct Writing of Dual-Scale 3D Structures for Cell Repelling at High Cellular Density.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A preliminary study on the role of Bacteroides fragilis in stent encrustation.World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Problems and solutions of stent biofilm and encrustations: A review of literature.Turkish journal of urology · 2020Review
- Efficacy of A Poly(MeOEGMA) Brush on the Prevention ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A Microfluidic-Based Investigation of Bacterial Attachment in Ureteral Stents.Micromachines · 2020Article
- Latest advancements in ureteral stent technology.Translational andrology and urology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ureteric stents are clinically deployed to retain ureteral patency in the presence of an obstruction of the ureter lumen. Despite the fact that multiple stent designs have been researched in recent years, encrustation and biofilm-associated infections remain significant complications of ureteral stenting, potentially leading to the functional failure of the stent. It has been suggested that "inactive" side-holes of stents may act as anchoring sites for encrusting crystals, as they are associated with low wall shear stress (WSS) levels. Obstruction of side-holes due to encrustation is particularly detrimental to the function of the stent, since holes provide a path for urine to by-pass the occlusion. Therefore, there is an unmet need to develop novel stents to reduce deposition of encrusting particles at side-holes. In this study, we employed a stent-on-chip microfluidic model of the stented and occluded ureter to investigate the effect of stent architecture on WSS distribution and encrustation over its surface. Variations in the stent geometry encompassed (i) the wall thickness and (ii) the shape of side-holes. Stent thickness was varied in the range 0.3-0.7 mm, while streamlined side-holes of triangular shape were evaluated (with a vertex angle in the range 45°-120°). Reducing the thickness of the stent increased WSS and thus reduced the encrustation rate at side-holes. A further improvement in performance was achieved by using side-holes with a triangular shape; notably, a 45° vertex angle showed superior performance compared to other angles investigated, resulting in a significant increase in WSS within "inactive" side-holes. In conclusion, combining the optimal stent thickness (0.3 mm) and hole vertex angle (45°) resulted in a ∼90% reduction in encrustation rate within side-holes, compared to a standard design. If translated to a full-scale ureteric stent, this optimised architecture has the potential for significantly increasing the stent lifetime while reducing clinical complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.