ArticleBiomicrofluidics2018
Two-way detection of image features and immunolabeling of lymphoma cells with one-step microarray analysis.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microfluidics for Blood Disorders and Hematological Disease Monitoring and Modeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Advances in Microfluidics for Single Red Blood Cell Analysis.Biosensors · 2023Review
- The Use of Upconversion Nanoparticles in Prostate Cancer Photodynamic Therapy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- A Microfluidic Detection System for Bladder Cancer Tumor Cells.Micromachines · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting the number of pathological lymphoma cells and lymphocyte subtypes in blood is helpful for clinical diagnosis and typing of lymphoma. In the current study, cell type is identified by cell morphological features and immunolabeled lymphocyte subtypes. Red blood cells and leukocytes were separated using a microfluidic cell chip based on physical blood cell parameters, and leukocytes were identified using five characteristic parameters: energy variance, entropy variance, moment of inertia variance, color mean, and cell area individually. The number of red blood cells that could come into contact with the leukocyte membrane was ≤2 based on the microfluidic injection flow rate of microfluidic chips. Anti-CD3 and anti-CD19 antibodies were used for immunofluorescence staining of T-lymphocyte and B-lymphocyte surface antigens, respectively. The results suggested that the microfluidic assay could detect lymphocyte surface antigen markers and intact leukocytes. Therefore, we report a one-step microfluidic chip for classifying hematological lymphoma cells based on the physical parameters of cells, which can simultaneously measure the overall morphology of blood cells and immunolabeling of lymphocyte surface antigens in one step, solving the current problem of detecting subtypes of hematological lymphoma cells based on multiple methods and multi-step detection.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.