Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30867830›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2019

A Blood-Based Multi Marker Assay Supports the Differential Diagnosis of Early-Stage Pancreatic Cancer.

Andreas W Berger, Daniel Schwerdel, Anke Reinacher-Schick, Waldemar Uhl, Hana Algül, Helmut Friess, Klaus-Peter Janssen, Alexander König, Michael Ghadimi, Eike Gallmeier and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Thrombospondin-2 as a diagnostic biomarker for distal cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Andreas W BergerUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Daniel SchwerdelUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Anke Reinacher-SchickRuhr-University Bochum, Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
Waldemar UhlRuhr-University Bochum, Department of Surgery, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany.
Hana AlgülTechnical University Munich, Department of Internal Medicine I, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Helmut FriessTechnical University Munich, Department of Surgery, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Klaus-Peter JanssenTechnical University Munich, Department of Surgery, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany.
Alexander KönigUniversity Medical Center Goettingen, Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Michael GhadimiUniversity Medical Centre Goettingen, Department of General, Visceral and Paediatric Surgery, Robert-Koch-Str. 40, 37075 Goettingen, Germany.
Eike GallmeierPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Gastroenterology and Endocrinology, Baldingerstraße, 35043 Marburg, Germany.
Detlef K BartschPhilipps University Marburg, Department of Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Baldingerstrasse, 35041, Marburg, Germany.
Michael GeisslerEsslingen Hospital, Department of Internal Medicine, Oncology/Hematology, Gastroenterology, Hirschlandstr. 97, 73730 Esslingen, Germany.
Ludger StaibEsslingen Hospital, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hirschlandstr. 97, 73730 Esslingen, Germany.
Andrea TannapfelRuhr-University Bochum, Department of Pathology, Buerkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany.
Alexander KlegerUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Alica BeutelUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Lucas-Alexander SchulteUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Marko KornmannUlm University, Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Thomas J EttrichUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.
Thomas SeufferleinUlm University, Department of Internal Medicine I, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, 89081 Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most frequent malignancy of the pancreas is the pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite many efforts PDAC has still a dismal prognosis. Biomarkers for early disease stage diagnosis as a prerequisite for a potentially curative treatment are still missing. Novel blood-based markers may help to overcome this limitation. Methods: Prior to surgery plasma levels of thrombospondin-2 (THBS2), which was recently published as a novel biomarker, and CA19-9 from 52 patients with histologically proven PDAC were determined, circulating cell-free (cfDNA) was quantified. 15 patients with side-branch IPMNs without worrisome features and 32 patients with chronic pancreatitis served for comparison. Logit (logistic regression) models were used to test the performance of single biomarkers and biomarker combinations. Results: CA19-9 and THBS2 alone showed comparable c-statistics of 0.80 and 0.73, respectively, improving to 0.87 when combining these two markers. The c-statistic was further increased to 0.94 when combining CA19-9 and THBS2 with cfDNA quantification. This marker combination performed best for all PDAC stages but also for PDACs grouped by stage. The greatest improvement over CA19-9 was seen in the group of stage I PDAC, from 0.69 to 0.90 for the three marker combination.

Indexed as

Diagnosis, DifferentialEarly DiagnosisAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorBlood Chemical AnalysisCarcinoma, Pancreatic DuctalCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDiagnostic Tests, RoutineFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAntigens, Tumor-Associated, CarbohydrateBiomarkers, TumorCell-Free Nucleic AcidsThrombospondin 2ThrombospondinsCA19-9circulating tumor DNAliquid biopsypancreatic cancerthrombospondin-2

Identifiers

PMID30867830
PMCPMC6401492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.